Jane Doe v. the DOJ, Continued

Trump admin appeals ruling in undocumented minor's abortion case

Jane Doe v. the DOJ, Continued
Illustration by Jason Stout

The Trump administration won’t let up on its mission to shame a young girl’s choice to have an abortion.

Jane Doe, an undocumented minor in Texas, struggled for a month to access abortion care after the Office of Refugee Resettlement, led by an anti-choice advocate, blocked her from attending clinic appointments, a move heavily supported by Attorney General Ken Paxton. In a series of back-and-forth rulings, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals finally granted Doe her constitutional right to abortion on Oct. 24, legally obtained through judicial bypass and aided by local nonprofit Jane’s Due Process.

But Trump’s defeated DOJ is looking for retribution, and on Nov. 3 filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court requesting a disciplining of her ACLU attorneys. In what is being considered an unusual and “extraordinary” filing, the DOJ alleges that Doe’s lawyers misled the government about the timing of her abortion and are asking the court to vacate the D.C. Circuit court ruling, part of a larger strategy to block undocumented minors in federal custody from obtaining abortion care.

“This administration has gone to astounding lengths to block this young woman from getting an abortion. Now, because they were unable to stop her, they are raising baseless questions about our conduct,” said ACLU Legal Director David Cole. “Our lawyers acted in the best interest of our client and in full compliance with the court orders and federal and Texas law. That government lawyers failed to seek judicial review quickly enough is their fault, not ours.”

Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at austinchronicle.com/opinion.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Repro Rights
Fetal Burial Trial Ends with Unanswered Questions
Fetal Burial Trial Ends with Unanswered Questions
Judge Ezra voices concern over women's access to health care under SB 8

Mary Tuma, July 20, 2018

Groups File Expansive Suit to Challenge Dozens of Abortion Restrictions
Groups File Expansive Suit to Challenge Dozens of Abortion Restrictions
Lawsuit filed Thursday in Austin federal court

Mary Tuma, June 14, 2018

More by Mary Tuma
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 5, 2021

Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 1, 2021

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

Repro Rights, Jane Doe

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Behind the scenes at The Austin Chronicle

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle