Judge Blocks Texas Abortion Ban

A preliminary injunction hearing is set for Sept. 14

A patient room at Whole Woman's Health clinic in Austin. WWH serves as one of the plaintiffs suing the state over its ban on D&E abortion.
A patient room at Whole Woman's Health clinic in Austin. WWH serves as one of the plaintiffs suing the state over its ban on D&E abortion. (Photo by Jana Birchum)

In a court order issued Thursday, U.S. Judge Lee Yeakel has placed a short-term halt on an upcoming Texas law that would have banned women from accessing dilation and evacuation, or D&E abortion, considered the safest and most common method during the second trimester (around 15 weeks of pregnancy) by health professionals.

The rule, originally scheduled to take effect this Friday, Sept. 1, is part of the Texas Lege’s package anti-choice law Senate Bill 8, deemed a cruel and unnecessary omnibus bill by reproductive health advocates.

The temporary block is a victory for Texas abortion providers, including Austin’s Whole Woman’s Health, who filed suit against the law and especially for young, low-income and rural women, most affected by harsh abortion regulations. Attorneys with both the Center for Reproductive Rights and the Attorney General’s office presented arguments in Austin-based federal court on Tuesday, Aug. 29. CRR said the ban would inflict irreparable harm on women by blocking their constitutionally-protected right to an abortion and subject women to “medical experimentation” as the three alternatives to D&E pose greater risk, while the state offered little concrete evidence the law actually does anything to help women’s safety instead relying on "respecting the life of the unborn," as an argument in lieu of protecting women's health.

Yeakel found CRR's arguments to have a high likelihood of success when further argued. The state, he wrote, cannot "pursue its interests in a way that denies a woman her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy before the fetus is viable." In a 17-page ruling, Yeakel wrote that the law leaves women and their physicians with abortion procedures that are, "more complex, risky, expensive, difficult for many women to arrange, and often involve multi-day visits to physicians, and overnight hospital stays." It serves the public interest to preserve the status quo to prevent harm to women and abortion providers, concluded Yeakel.

The temporary restraining order on the ban expires Sept. 14, at which point a preliminary injunction hearing is set to take place in Austin-based federal court.

To read the full ruling, click here.

READ MORE
More abortion rights
Attorneys Fight D&E Abortion Ban in Court
Attorneys Fight D&E Abortion Ban in Court
Judge Yeakel plans to issue ruling “quickly” before Sept. 1

Mary Tuma, Aug. 29, 2017

State Axes Anti-Choice Group's Family Planning Funds
Texas Defunds Anti-Choice Group
The Heidi Group failed to meet their own patient target goals

Mary Tuma, Aug. 23, 2017

More Reproductive Rights
"Rape Insurance" Bill Close to Becoming Law
HB 214 bars private, state-offered, and ACA abortion coverage

Mary Tuma, Aug. 13, 2017

Senate Speeds Through Anti-Choice Bills
Senate Speeds Through Anti-Choice Bills
Senate prioritizes anti-abortion bills during special session

Mary Tuma, July 25, 2017

More by Mary Tuma
Downtown Puzzle: Dell Seton’s Innovation Station
Downtown Puzzle: Dell Seton’s Innovation Station
Goodbye to Brackenridge, hello to ...?

Sept. 22, 2017

County Judge Sarah Eckhardt on Greg Abbott's Texas Hammer
County Judge Sarah Eckhardt on Greg Abbott's Texas Hammer
"Local control had been a darling of the state for years, and now it has become the enemy"

Sept. 22, 2017

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

abortion rights, Reproductive Rights, Lee Yeakel, SB 8, D&E Abortion

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
AC Daily, Events and Promotions, Luvdoc Answers

Breaking news, recommended events, and more

Official Chronicle events, promotions, and giveaways

Updates for SXSW 2017

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)