Statesman Advertising Supplement Cheers Eastside Gentrification

Update: Statesman removes article, reiterates apology

Congratulations, California investors and trendy millennial homeowners! Too long have you been vilified. But the Austin American-Statesman is here to put you in your rightful place, as saviors of the Eastside, nudging all those black and brown residents and business owners aside to make way for the glorious hipster coming.

Stock image hipsters, loving that "authentic hipster and taco experience" (screenshot via Statesman.com)

That was the coded message at least of a Saturday Statesman advertising supplement article touting East Downtown’s “hipster paradise.” Witness the opening graf:

“A decade ago Austinites would rarely dare to venture to the east side of the I H 35 corridor. Though the city has never been home to truly seedy or sinister areas, going east of the highway prior to the mass gentrification of downtown was not advised. However, now that the neighborhood has been purchased by California investors and trendy millennial home-owners, East Downtown is one of the city’s most desirable locales.”

Adding further insult to idiocy, the story continues:

“Though the current demographic of East Downtown swings more towards millennial hipsters with no children, the area’s surge in property taxes will have a great impact on the Austin Independent School District campuses in the area, particularly Johnston High School, priming it to be a top school by the time the area has a full teenage population to send it.”

Of note: Johnston High School closed in 2008. (It has since been repurposed as Eastside Memorial High School at the Johnston Campus.)

Social media response to the article has been fast and furious – Facebook user Gabo Jamail perfectly summed up his reaction with a photo of the story in print and his extended middle finger. Recognizing a PR crisis brewing, the Statesman replied in the user's comments with a preview of the editor’s note set to run in Monday’s issue:

“An article about East Austin in the advertising supplement Homes in Saturday’s paper had an unfair characterization of the neighborhood’s past. The story, which was written by a content marketing freelancer, did not receive the proper review before publication, and we apologize for the oversight.”

courtesy Gabo Jamail

UPDATED 12:11pm: The Statesman has tweeted that it's taking the story down.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More gentrification
Casar Defends His Opposition to East Riverside Rezoning Request
Casar Defends His Opposition to East Riverside Rezoning Request
Council member argues the density gains aren’t worth displacing current residents

Michael King, March 22, 2019

Life After Gentrification
Life After Gentrification
When you and your home both have to move

Joseph Caterine, Jan. 5, 2018

More by Kimberley Jones
The Sun Is Also a Star
Is it destiny that brings these two lovers together, or the bland demands of a YA adaptation?

May 17, 2019

The Biggest Little Farm
Country life documentary may be an extended infomercial, but that can't dent its charm

May 17, 2019

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

Statesman, gentrification

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle