Council: Incompatible Binaries

TNC debate still sucking all the available oxygen

An already busy City Council year – after one meeting – won’t ease up anytime soon. And though there’s a wide range of pending business – general transportation, affordability, short-term rentals, major contracts, even Council’s own rules – TNC’s remain the elephant on the dais.

City Council's Lower Depths (Illustration by Jason Stout)

Last Thursday’s meeting (Jan. 28) lasted into the wee hours (adjournment about 2:15 a.m. Friday), and although the matter of the moment was short-term rental regulations, the afternoon’s transportation network company debate took enough time and testimony that nearly everything else (especially hours of public testimony on PUDs and STR’s) was pushed into the late evening. (The timing became its own issue, as Council members lamented their inability to limit the long meetings, and vowed to do better going forward … if only they can find the time.)

Tuesday’s morning work session (still in progress mid-afternoon) considered a few other things – notably a fledgling attempt to explore if the city can assume some of Austin ISD’s property tax burden, thereby lessening state recapture and total tax bill – but soon enough the dominating subject became the Uber-&-Lyft-underwritten petition supporting a TNC-written ordinance. City Clerk Jannette Goodall reported that the roughly 23,000 or so submitted petition signatures (about 19,000 were required) had been certified, there was a brief discussion of the statistical methods employed in certification, and the discussion moved to what happens next.

Under the City Charter, Council doesn’t have much choice: it can either adopt the ordinance petition as drafted or submit it to the voters in May. In an extended disquisition, Mayor Steve Adler said he abhors “binary choices,” and still hopes to come up with some compromise solution that would satisfy a divided Council, the TNC’s, TNC drivers, the various nonprofit orgs, public safety advocates, etc. (Almost entirely lost in the discussion have been some 900+ full-time, mostly minority cab drivers whose livelihoods have been undermined by the part-time “contractor”-model TNC’s.) Uber and Lyft have already rejected the mayor’s “Thumb’s Up!” fingerprint incentive, but the mayor suggested that perhaps a couple of weeks’ deliberation might turn the tide in some yet to be determined way, via another "innovation ordinance."

The rest of the Council was polarized between those who would simply accede to the petitioners (Don Zimmerman, Ellen Troxclair) and those who prefer going to voters and making their case (Delia Garza, Sabino Renteria), with a spectrum in between. For the moment, they tentatively decided to hear public testimony on the matter Thursday evening (6:30 p.m.) and perhaps again Feb. 11, and use that time and those discussions to find a way forward.

And if there’s time left over, there’s plenty of other work. Some highlights:

Health and Human Services: Four proposals to provide additional youth education services, including three (Items 12, 14, 15) that would take on some of the load now carried by Austin ISD for parent support services, after-school enrichment, and student mentoring.

Larry Jackson Jr. aftermath: A proposed settlement of the civil lawsuit brought by Jackson’s mother, Billie Mercer, for the July 2013 fatal shooting of Jackson by former Austin Police Department Detective Charles Kleinert. (Item 16)

APD Budget bump: $1.5 million in additional funding for “public safety support for the Spring Festival Season.” (Item 21)

Council procedures: Resolution proposed by D4 CM Greg Casar to revise rules governing the committee system – likely for discussion only Thursday. (Item 36)

Art vs. ReManufacturing: Austin Resource Recovery wants to sell a piece of land near ABIA to help finance its recycling/remanufacturing facility (Item 45); Mayor Pro Tem Kathie Tovo wants to use it for a proposed Artspace live/work project (Item 38).

Floodplain buyouts: $10 million toward another 25 home buyouts in the Williamson Creek 25-year floodplain. (Item 47)

And there’s more, of course, where all that came from. For more on City Council, follow the Daily News and this week’s print edition. Thursday's agenda is available here.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More City Council 2016
Council: Robert Rules, OK?
Council Wrap Feb. 16
Plaza Saltillo inches forward, Capitol views move East, and tears flow

Michael King, Feb. 20, 2017

Council: Tuesday Work Session … & Then Some
Council Preview
Grove public hearing and briefings extend the working agenda

Michael King, Dec. 6, 2016

More by Michael King
Point Austin: The Abbott and GOP Project Is an Exercise in Brute Political Cynicism
Point Austin: The Abbott and GOP Project Is an Exercise in Brute Political Cynicism
What’s at stake in Texas

June 12, 2024

Point Austin: Everything Old Is New Again
Point Austin: Everything Old Is New Again
The long, honorable history of students “disturbing the war”

May 4, 2024


City Council 2016, transportation network companies

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle