Report: Anti-Abortion Law Forces Women to Wait Longer for Procedure

Some Austin women forced to wait up to 20 days for abortion

Report: Anti-Abortion Law Forces Women to Wait Longer for Procedure
Illustration by Jason Stout

The evidence demonstrating the disastrous effects of abortion-restrictive law, House Bill 2, on Texas women continues to pile up. But the willingness of anti-choice lawmakers and conservative-leaning judges to accept the reality is an entirely different story.

In their latest findings, released today, The University of Texas at Austin’s Texas Policy Evaluation Project (TxPEP) found that women are being forced to wait longer to get an appointment at abortion clinics since 2013’s HB 2 was enacted. Women in Austin are waiting up to as long as 20 days to see a physician, in contrast to waiting an average of five days or less before HB 2. Today, only two local clinics provide abortion services (Planned Parenthood South and Austin Women’s Health Center) – down from four before HB2. The same wait time goes for women in the Dallas-Ft. Worth metro area, where half the clinics shut down over the past two years (down from eight to four).

While researchers found stable and short wait times in Houston and San Antonio, they caution that could soon change if the U.S. Supreme Court fails to block the final provision of HB2, which would force clinics to comply with the same expensive building requirements as ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). The ratio of patients to open facilities would “increase significantly” in Austin, Dallas-Ft. Worth, and Houston, they write in their research brief. If non-ASC clinics did close across the state, the lone surviving ASC clinic in Austin would see an annual number of abortions performed jump from about 3,700 to almost 7,500. Researchers suggest a link with the “intermittent reduced supply” of abortion services in Austin to limited physician availability. And wait times at existing ASCs were 10 days or longer over the past year, they also note, meaning the centers can barely meet current patient demand.

Women would also be pushed from the first trimester of pregnancy to the second trimester, raising the annual number of those later-term abortions to about 6,600 in 2013 to nearly 12,400. “The increase in second-trimester abortion is concerning from a public health perspective, since later abortions, although very safe, are associated with a higher risk of complications compared to early abortions. Later abortion procedures are also significantly more costly to women,” says Dr. Daniel Grossman, a TxPEP co-investigator.

The research is part of a five-year analysis of the legislative impact on women’s health in Texas. The UT team, which has a partnership with Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health at the University of California, San Francisco; Ibis Reproductive Health; and the University of Alabama-Birmingham, has already discovered other startling findings along the way, including a decrease in legal abortion; increased travel time to clinics; and data showing Texas women face at least one barrier to accessing reproductive health care.

Starting its new term today, SCOTUS will consider whether or not to take up the Texas abortion case. The number of abortion clinics in the state dropped by half – from 41 to 18 – due to the extreme laws.

“If you want to see the result of Republican leadership's devastating attacks on women's health, look no further than Texas,” said Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards, fresh off being grilled by anti-choice Congressional members, in a statement. “This new report shows us that restrictions are forcing abortion later in pregnancy, if a woman can access a procedure at all. While abortion is an extremely safe procedure, it is safest earlier in pregnancy. This is making women undergo a more invasive procedure later in pregnancy, for political—and not medical—reasons.”

For more, check out our War on Women's Health page.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More abortion rights
Fifth Circuit Hears Objections to Texas' Fetal Burial Law
Fifth Circuit Hears Objections to Texas' Fetal Burial Law
Anti-abortion measure currently on hold pending appeals

Saskia Henn, Sept. 18, 2019

Council Members To Back Abortion Support Budget Measure
CMs Plan To Support Abortion Funds
Garza, Casar plan support for $100K in abortion assistance

Mary Tuma, Aug. 15, 2019

More Reproductive Rights
Pro-Choice Groups Strike Back at Malicious Abortion Foe
Pro-Choice Groups Strike Back at Malicious Abortion Foe
Leader of small-town ban effort slapped with defamation suit

Mary Tuma, June 11, 2020

5th Circuit Restores Medication Abortion (For Now)
5th Circuit Restores Medication Abortion (For Now)
Latest twist in legal battle offers partial victory to providers

Mary Tuma, April 14, 2020

More by Mary Tuma
SCOTUS Protects Abortion Rights, Upholds Texas Precedent
SCOTUS Protects Abortion Rights, Upholds Texas Precedent
Roberts concurs with majority to strike down Louisiana measure

June 29, 2020

After a Month of Chaos, Abortion Care Returns to Texas
After a Month of Chaos, Abortion Care Returns to Texas
Clinics, patients, and the law get put through the ringer over care

May 1, 2020

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

House Bill 2, abortion rights, reproductive rights

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle