Report: Anti-Abortion Law Forces Women to Wait Longer for Procedure

Some Austin women forced to wait up to 20 days for abortion

Report: Anti-Abortion Law Forces Women to Wait Longer for Procedure
Illustration by Jason Stout

The evidence demonstrating the disastrous effects of abortion-restrictive law, House Bill 2, on Texas women continues to pile up. But the willingness of anti-choice lawmakers and conservative-leaning judges to accept the reality is an entirely different story.

In their latest findings, released today, The University of Texas at Austin’s Texas Policy Evaluation Project (TxPEP) found that women are being forced to wait longer to get an appointment at abortion clinics since 2013’s HB 2 was enacted. Women in Austin are waiting up to as long as 20 days to see a physician, in contrast to waiting an average of five days or less before HB 2. Today, only two local clinics provide abortion services (Planned Parenthood South and Austin Women’s Health Center) – down from four before HB2. The same wait time goes for women in the Dallas-Ft. Worth metro area, where half the clinics shut down over the past two years (down from eight to four).

While researchers found stable and short wait times in Houston and San Antonio, they caution that could soon change if the U.S. Supreme Court fails to block the final provision of HB2, which would force clinics to comply with the same expensive building requirements as ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). The ratio of patients to open facilities would “increase significantly” in Austin, Dallas-Ft. Worth, and Houston, they write in their research brief. If non-ASC clinics did close across the state, the lone surviving ASC clinic in Austin would see an annual number of abortions performed jump from about 3,700 to almost 7,500. Researchers suggest a link with the “intermittent reduced supply” of abortion services in Austin to limited physician availability. And wait times at existing ASCs were 10 days or longer over the past year, they also note, meaning the centers can barely meet current patient demand.

Women would also be pushed from the first trimester of pregnancy to the second trimester, raising the annual number of those later-term abortions to about 6,600 in 2013 to nearly 12,400. “The increase in second-trimester abortion is concerning from a public health perspective, since later abortions, although very safe, are associated with a higher risk of complications compared to early abortions. Later abortion procedures are also significantly more costly to women,” says Dr. Daniel Grossman, a TxPEP co-investigator.

The research is part of a five-year analysis of the legislative impact on women’s health in Texas. The UT team, which has a partnership with Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health at the University of California, San Francisco; Ibis Reproductive Health; and the University of Alabama-Birmingham, has already discovered other startling findings along the way, including a decrease in legal abortion; increased travel time to clinics; and data showing Texas women face at least one barrier to accessing reproductive health care.

Starting its new term today, SCOTUS will consider whether or not to take up the Texas abortion case. The number of abortion clinics in the state dropped by half – from 41 to 18 – due to the extreme laws.

“If you want to see the result of Republican leadership's devastating attacks on women's health, look no further than Texas,” said Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards, fresh off being grilled by anti-choice Congressional members, in a statement. “This new report shows us that restrictions are forcing abortion later in pregnancy, if a woman can access a procedure at all. While abortion is an extremely safe procedure, it is safest earlier in pregnancy. This is making women undergo a more invasive procedure later in pregnancy, for political—and not medical—reasons.”

For more, check out our War on Women's Health page.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More abortion rights
Fifth Circuit Hears Objections to Texas' Fetal Burial Law
Fifth Circuit Hears Objections to Texas' Fetal Burial Law
Anti-abortion measure currently on hold pending appeals

Saskia Henn, Sept. 18, 2019

Council Members To Back Abortion Support Budget Measure
CMs Plan To Support Abortion Funds
Garza, Casar plan support for $100K in abortion assistance

Mary Tuma, Aug. 15, 2019

More Reproductive Rights
Local Legal Leaders Come Out Swinging Against Anti-Abortion Bills
Local Legal Leaders Come Out Swinging Against Anti-Abortion Bills
Proposals let literally anyone drag providers into court

Mary Tuma, April 30, 2021

Lege Finds Even More Funds for Anti-Choice Grifters
Lege Finds Even More Funds for Anti-Choice Grifters
Alternatives to Abortion program gets $100M in House budget

Mary Tuma, April 23, 2021

More by Mary Tuma
Texas' Draconian Abortion Restrictions Likely to Face Court Challenge
Texas' Draconian Abortion Restrictions Likely to Face Court Challenge
Amid clouds and darkness, Texans get ready to fight for choice

June 4, 2021

Texas House Passes Near-Total Abortion Ban
Texas House Passes Near-Total Abortion Ban
SB 8 allows anyone the right to sue a provider

May 5, 2021


House Bill 2, abortion rights, reproductive rights

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle