Report: Half of Women Face Barriers to Repro Health Care

Survey shows majority of women face barriers to access

A new survey shows women cited cost as the primary barrier to accessing reproductive health care following drastic cuts to family planning services by the state. (Photo by TxPEP Research)

A new survey by the Texas Policy Evaluation Project (TxPEP) – a multiyear effort examining the impact of state budget slashes to family planning from 2011 to 2014 – shows that a majority (55%) of women face at least one barrier to reproductive health care access, including access to cervical cancer screenings, with cost being the leading barrier.

Respondents also cited discomfort with health care providers; inability to take time off work or school; and inability to find a provider that accepted their insurance. Poor, less educated, Spanish-speaking women born in Mexico saw the greatest number of hurdles to access.

The results are more proof of the drastic changes caused by the state’s massive cuts to women’s health care, starting with 2011 when conservative lawmakers’ reduced family planning funds by two-thirds, or $74 million, resulting in the closure or discontinued services at more than 80 clinics. And the damage could very well continue: This legislative session, the Senate version of the budget would throw up roadblocks for Planned Parenthood patients seeking access to breast and cervical cancer screenings (see “Defund Planned Parenthood…Jeopardize Lives,” Feb. 13).

The survey also highlighted women’s desire to access better, more effective contraception – 61% of women using less effective methods (i.e., condoms, spermicide, withdrawal, and the rhythm method) would prefer to use more effective forms of birth control, including hormonal birth control, sterilization, and long-acting reversible contraceptives such as IUDs and implants. Researchers suggest that use of the preferred methods would “increase if available at no out-of-pocket cost.”

Some 779 women between the ages of 18 and 49 participated in the survey conducted by researchers from The University of Texas, in conjunction with Ibis Reproductive Health, and the University of Alabama-Birmingham.

Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Women's Health
SCOTUS Protects Abortion Rights, Upholds Texas Precedent
SCOTUS Protects Abortion Rights, Upholds Texas Precedent
Roberts concurs with majority to strike down Louisiana measure

Mary Tuma, June 29, 2020

HB 2 Protesters Return to Court
HB 2 Protesters Return to Court
Prosecutors juggle charges – A, B, C – without resolution

Jordan Smith, April 22, 2014

More by Mary Tuma
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 5, 2021

Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 1, 2021


Women's Health, Reproductive Health Care

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle