Judge Rules Against DNA Testing in Reed Case

Resets the execution date for March 5

Rodney Reed
Rodney Reed

A last-ditch effort to introduce new DNA testing into the case of Rodney Reed was denied Tuesday evening shortly after 5pm in a Bastrop County courtroom. Visiting Judge Doug Shaver ruled against the Bastrop native, on death row since 1998. Supporters for Reed said that Shaver’s reasoning was not clear.

In addition to denying the testing, Shaver accepted a motion from the state to move Reed’s execution date from Jan. 14, 2015 to March 5, 2015 – an interesting move considering that the state presented testimony on Tuesday that the “untimely application for the DNA testing” had amounted to an “unreasonable delay in the execution date.” That information was relayed through the Campaign to End the Death Penalty’s Lily Hughes, who was in the courtroom throughout the day. She added: “They said it was a tactic to delay the execution.”

Reed, 46, was convicted in 1998 for the April 1996 killing of 19-year-old Stacey Stites. Stites’ body was found by the side of a road near Bastrop. DNA from semen found inside her body linked Reed to the crime, though it’s been hotly contested as to whether he was in fact the killer. (Aside from the DNA, there was no other physical evidence linking Reed to the crime. Reed maintains that he was having a secretive affair with Stites before her death.) In recent years, support has mounted for the possibility that Stites' then-fiancé Jimmy Fennell Jr., a former Georgetown police sergeant currently serving time in prison for rape, actually killed her.

DNA testing has occurred throughout the lengthy appeals process, though never on a piece of the belt used to strangle Stites to death. The motion to test the items was introduced in July at the hearing in which Reed’s January execution date was set. Hughes said the defense spent a portion of Tuesday’s proceedings trying to convince Judge Shaver that there had been changes to the laws surrounding DNA testing that made the kind of testing they were asking for available.

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Reed’s appeal for a new trial on the basis that he received incompetent legal help during his initial trial in 1998.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Rodney Reed
Rodney Reed Hearing Gets Underway
Rodney Reed Hearing Gets Underway
What was Jimmy Fennell doing before his fiancé's murder?

Sarah Marloff, Oct. 11, 2017

Rodney Reed Hearing Set for October
Rodney Reed Hearing Set for October
Exculpatory evidence at issue in four-day hearing

Chase Hoffberger, July 9, 2017

More by Chase Hoffberger
Revisiting the Railroad Killer
Revisiting the Railroad Killer
Local journo Alex Hannaford’s Dead Man Talking podcast investigates the case against a man on death row

Nov. 16, 2018

EMS Union Set for Leadership Contest
EMS Union Set for Leadership Contest
Association to cast ballot between incumbent Tony Marquardt or challenger Selena Xie

Nov. 16, 2018

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

Rodney Reed, death penalty, Stacey Stites, Jimmy Fennell Jr.

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle