Supreme Court Upholds Voter ID

Declines to vacate the Fifth Circuit's ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Voter ID

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued the final word (for now) on Texas' voter ID law.

As we reported in last week's issue, the Fifth Circuit stayed an injunction that would have blocked the law from being enforced, citing earlier cases where the Supreme Court had resisted changing laws when an election was imminent. The Supreme Court's order contained no reasoning, but simply upheld the Fifth Circuit's decision.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, issued a six-page dissent, arguing that the difference between this case and the others is that Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos' injunction was permanent, "following a full trial and resting on an extensive record from which the District Court found ballot-access discrimination by the State." She went onto say that the test the Fifth Circuit should have used was not how close to election day the injunction came, but rather the standard test used to evaluate the stay of an injunction: "applicant’s likelihood of success on the merits and whether applicant would suffer irreparable injury absent a stay." Ginsburg disagreed also with the Fifth Circuit's contention that the change of law would disrupt the election, since the injunction simply required a return to the law that was in effect before the current voter ID law.

Ginsburg cited Ramos' finding that Texas' efforts to educate poll workers and the public about voter ID have been "woefully lacking," and argued that "any voter confusion or lack of public confidence in Texas’ electoral processes is in this case largely attributable to the State itself." After discussing the ways in which the law may operate as an unconstitutional poll tax, Ginsburg concluded, "The greatest threat to public confidence in elections in this case is the prospect of enforcing a purposefully discriminatory law, one that likely imposes an unconstitutional poll tax and risks denying the right to vote to hundreds of thousands of eligible voters."

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Voter ID
Austin Resident Named in Texas Voter Purge Debacle, Files Suit
Voter Purge Debacle Cont.
"They basically accused me of committing fraud"

Mary Tuma, Feb. 5, 2019

Texas' Big, Bad Week for Voter Suppression and Gerrymandering
Texas' Big, Bad Week for Voter Suppression and Gerrymandering
Within two days, courts reject second election map, voter ID bill

Richard Whittaker, Aug. 25, 2017

More by Amy Kamp
Notes on Kamp: Cowards
Notes on Kamp: Cowards
Why is the right wing so scared of voting rights?

June 3, 2016

Notes on Kamp: Theory and Practice
Notes on Kamp: Theory and Practice
Labor protections are worthless if not enforced

May 27, 2016


Voter ID, U.S. Supreme Court, Fifth Circuit, Nelva Gonzales Ramos, Ruth Bader Ginsburg

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle