City Props & Bonds Close Early

The early vote and the E-day vote ride steady

City Props & Bonds Close Early

There were no dramatic changes from morning until night on election day, at least regarding the City of Austin's charter propositions and bond packages. The big Props winners - early vote and e-day - were election changes, 10-1 geographic districts, and civil service rights for city employees. The question soon becomes: What did we just do?

Props 1 & 2, which will move city elections from May to November, and change council terms and term limits to correspond to that change, won overwhelmingly (essentially 3 to 1). The heavily contested Props. 3 and 4 -- geographic districting in two versions -- both won, but the 10-1 plus "independent commission" garnered 60% and the 8-2-1 "hybrid" only 51%, so 10-1 rules.

And the big civil service props -- 10 and 11 -- which grant important hiring, disciplinary, and firing protections to city employees (10) and EMS staff specifically (11), won handily (58% and 70%, respectively), and worth noting that was despite fairly hysterical opposition from the Statesman's editors, who persisted in using enormously exaggerated cost estimates long after city administration had abandoned them.

Of the 11 charter proposals, two went down - the city manager (and not Council) will go right on hiring the city attorney (Prop. 6), and there will be no additional month for council candidates to retire campaign debt (Prop. 8).

All the bonds passed but Prop. 15 -- an affordable housing measure, including repairs for homes of elderly residents -- and that's somewhat mysterious, as voters have supported such bonds before and the rest of the bonds passed easily. Sudden resistance to affordable housing in a town that never stops talking about "affordability"? Confusing ballot language? Call it the night's local headscratcher.

There's a lot more to say about all of this, but as a couple of Driskill return watchers remarked tonight after Austin voters reversed six previous elections against geographic districts: "We're in a whole new universe" for City of Austin elections and governance -- and it's much too early to know quite what that will mean.

Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More 2012 Election
Early City Vote Mixed
Early City Vote Mixed
Most props & bonds passing -- but not all

Michael King, Nov. 6, 2012

More by Michael King
<i>Hope and Hard Truth: A Life in Texas Politics</i>
Hope and Hard Truth: A Life in Texas Politics
Life beyond the governor’s office with Ann Richards’ chief aide

Sept. 2, 2022

Embattled Doctor Prevails Against the Texas Medical Board
Embattled Doctor Prevails Against the Texas Medical Board
The little guy wins

June 24, 2022


2012 Election, Elections 2012

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Behind the scenes at The Austin Chronicle

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle