Third Court Rules in Willingham Case

Matter must be referred to Judge Stubblefield

Cameron Todd Willingham
Cameron Todd Willingham

The Third Court of Appeals has ruled that the region's presiding administrative judge must consider whether to grant recusal of Travis Co. District Judge Charlie Baird in the case of executed inmate Cameron Todd Willingham.

In October, Baird heard testimony of fire experts, brought by lawyers for Willingham, during a proceeding seeking to posthumously clear Willingham's name. Baird was also asked to consider whether cause exists to initiate a court of inquiry into the actions (or inaction) of state officials prior to Willingham's death. At issue there is whether state officials (likely the State Fire Marshals Office and Gov. Rick Perry) relied on faulty science (and ignored new evidence) to conclude that Willingham set the 1991 fire at his Corsicana home that killed his three young children.

Navarro Co. District Attorney R. Lowell Thompson had sought to recuse Baird, who he said he believed couldn't be objective on the matter (because he had received an award from an anti-death penalty group, or alternately, because he'd once ruled in favor of upholding Willingham's death sentence while Baird was serving as a justice on the Court of Criminal Appeals). Baird heard his claim but ruled that Thompson was not a party to the action brought by Willingham's surviving relatives. Baird allowed the hearing to continue and Thompson went to the Third Court seeking to stop the hearing. The hearing had just concluded when the Third Court granted Thompson's motion, staying the proceeding – meaning, in effect, that the court would not allow Baird to enter his final ruling in the matter.

In its opinion, written by Chief Justice Woodie Jones, joined by Justice Bob Pemberton (Justice David Puryear also considered the case and filed a dissent to the two-judge majority ruling), the court concluded that Baird should have recused himself or else refer that motion to the region's presiding judge, Williamson County's Billy Ray Stubblefield, for consideration.

In dissent, Puryear concluded that although the hearing was unique – and that he believed Baird might have been stepping outside his authority – that didn't mean that the appeals court had the authority to intervene, he wrote.

You can read the opinions here.

(The above post was corrected on 12/22 to better reflect the substance of Puryear's dissent.)

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 36 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
MORE Death Penalty
Death Watch: Madness and Forensics
Death Watch: Madness and Forensics
Two capital cases raise psychological and evidentiary issues

Jordan Smith, Oct. 4, 2013

Death Watch: Running Low on Poison
Death Watch: Running Low on Poison
The state of Texas has three executions' worth of pentobarbitol

Jordan Smith, Aug. 9, 2013

More by Jordan Smith
'Chrome Underground' Goes Classic Car Hunting
'Chrome Underground' Goes Classic Car Hunting
Motoreum's Yusuf & Antonio talk about the biz and their reality TV debut

May 22, 2014

APD Brass Shifts Up, Down, Across
APD Brass Shifts Up, Down, Across
Musical chairs at Downtown HQ

May 9, 2014

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

courts, Cameron Todd Willingham, Charlie Baird, Third Court of Appeals, death penalty, Rick Perry, State Fire Marshals Office

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle