El Paso Resolves to Stand by Ciudad Juarez

Council member argues war on drugs explains violence in sister city

Beto O'Rourke
Beto O'Rourke

Once again the El Paso city council has denounced the ongoing drug-fueled violence in its sister city, Ciudad Juarez – and, once again, a provision denouncing the nation's War on Drugs has been struck from a resolution of support for the beleaguered city south of the border.

After hearing more than two hours of public testimony on Feb. 9, the council voted 6-2 to pass the resolution, but without a controversial passage calling for legalization and government regulation of marijuana. A vote on the original resolution, drafted by Council members Beto O'Rourke and Steve Ortega, ended in a 4-4 tie before Mayor John Cook weighed in to quash the measure.

This is not the first time that O'Rourke has raised serious questions about the impact of the drug war on the fortunes of Juarez, and by extension, El Paso. Last January, in a similar sister-city resolution, O'Rourke sponsored language that called for a serious national debate – from El Paso to Washington, D.C. – about drug policy and the possibility of legalization. The measure earned the support of a majority of the countil but was then vetoed by Cook. The move also prompted the El Paso state Lege delegation to pen a letter suggesting that O'Rourke was irresponsible to even suggest such a discussion, a sentiment echoed by U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes. (Notably absent from the El Paso delegation's letter was Sen. Eliot Shapleigh who strongly disagreed with the position of his colleagues.)

Considering how vehement opposition was to the mere suggestion of opening a dialog about drug policy, its probably no surprise that the council did not pass the most recent resolution without first excising the offending language suggesting that marijuana be legalized and taxed. But O'Rourke did not make that suggestion lightly. Instead, he told Reefer Madness, "[w]e were very meticulous about documenting this." By the federal government's own estimation, he says, marijuana trafficking to the U.S. accounts for 60% of cartel profits. Take away that source of income, he says, and you severely cripple the cartel operations. "It's a very simple logic that we applied to this," he said. "Stop them from killing and terrorizing with impunity. It's not a magic bullet," but its a start.

However sound the logic, and, really, however modest the proposal, it did not make it into the final draft. Still, this year's resolution is a fairly sternly worded document, calling on Mexican President Felipe Calderon and President Barack Obama to come together in El Paso for a summit discussion "to develop a coordinated strategy to bring an immediate end to the drug violence in our community," reads the document. The resolution also calls on the government to make specific changes that would ease the woes in Juarez, which, for good or ill, reverberate across El Paso and into the rest of the state. Chief among those changes, says O'Rourke, is the proposal that immigration officials change their standard operating procedure when deporting Mexican nationals. As it stands, he said, when the government deports illegal immigrants – for either basic immigration violations or for criminal violations – they escort the person to "the middle of our international bridge, and leave them there to fend for themselves." That isn't easy – especially for those people who aren't actually from the area. "These are ready recruits for or victims of these cartels," he said. Instead, the government should "repatriate [immigrants] to their state and city of origin."

While those proposals also caught some flak from the public, the council ultimately passed the resolution – but without O'Rourke's vote. Ultimately, O'Rourke felt that resolution provisions should not be cherry-picked. "The situation really has gotten a lot worse since last year," he said. Indeed, 250 people have been murdered there already in 2010; 2,650 were murdered in 2009, up from more than 1,600 in 2008. "I will continue to speak out on this."

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More war on drugs
Should Texas Legalize Marijuana?
Should Texas Legalize Marijuana?
That's what Progress Texas wants to know

Jordan Smith, April 1, 2014

Super (Reefer) Bowl I
Super (Reefer) Bowl I
Pot-state teams battle in game, pot advocates battle on billboards

Jordan Smith, Jan. 31, 2014

More Marijuana
APD (Finally) Ends Low-Level Marijuana Enforcement
APD (Finally) Ends Low-Level Marijuana Enforcement
Chief announces move, six months after Council told him to

Austin Sanders, July 2, 2020

Abbott Orders Texas Prosecutors to Enforce Marijuana Laws
Abbott Orders Texas Prosecutors to Enforce Marijuana Laws
Travis County D.A. says dismissals will continue

Kevin Curtin, July 18, 2019

More by Jordan Smith
'Chrome Underground' Goes Classic Car Hunting
'Chrome Underground' Goes Classic Car Hunting
Motoreum's Yusuf & Antonio talk about the biz and their reality TV debut

May 22, 2014

APD Brass Shifts Up, Down, Across
APD Brass Shifts Up, Down, Across
Musical chairs at Downtown HQ

May 9, 2014

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

War on Drugs, Reefer Madness, Marijuana, Beto O'Rourke

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle