The PUD-a-WOO Solution

How to fix PUDS in the waterfront overlay

Those upset that planned unit development rezonings could trump the protections of the revised waterfront overlay ordinance - which comes back for city council action on Thursday - might push for PUD-a-WOO's to have required urban design plans.

"I'd be thrilled," said Danette Chimenti, a Waterfront Overlay Task Force member, if in addition to requiring a supermajority vote for a PUD-a-WOO rezoning, council would ensure a higher standard by requiring PUD applicants to submit a detailed urban design plan for the large, complex projects.

The long fight over the East Avenue PUD (for the redevelopment of the Concordia University campus, recently rechristened University Park) was only resolved when a vague “bubble diagram” plan was replaced with a detailed urban design framework plan. (See “Up From The Muck at Concordia,” March 30, 2007.)

The “SuperPUD ordinance” passed last year, and intended to prevent such fights in the future, requires a higher level of community benefits – but not a detailed urban design plan.

Incorporating that requirement into the PUD ordinance was recommended by Jana McCann of ROMA Austin, who led the Concordia solution. (See “What's Wrong With the Super PUD,” June 6, 2008.)

The fact that most Waterfront Overlay Task Force members oppose PUDs within the WOO indicates that last year’s revisions weren’t enough to earn community trust in PUDs as a tool for superior projects.

Jim Adams of ROMA says he has seen similar zoning work well without controversy in other cities, such as San Jose, California, where applicants must submit “an urban design scheme, at a sophisticated level of detail” that communicates clearly what the project will be like.

If a requirement for an overall urban design plan were added – to either the PUD ordinance or the WOO ordinance – it could prevent headaches and delays for all concerned on future PUD proposals.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More waterfront overlay
Dreaming Big With Lady Bird
Dreaming Big With Lady Bird
Team's preliminary recommendations for Lady Bird Lake's south shore

Monica Riese, June 7, 2012

More PUD
Closing the Book on Camelback
Closing the Book on Camelback
Lakeside project clears its last City Hall hurdles

Michael King, Nov. 14, 2018

More by Katherine Gregor
Climate Protection: City in No Hurry To Cool It
Climate Protection: City in No Hurry To Cool It
Checking in on the Climate Protection Program's progress – or lack thereof

Aug. 6, 2010

Climate Change Crosses County Lines
Climate Change Crosses County Lines
Study predicts how climate change will affect Texas' future water needs

July 30, 2010


Downtown, Development, waterfront overlay, PUD

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle