Naishtat Files Medi-Pot Bill
Naishtat to Lege: Protect Pot Patients
By Jordan Smith, 2:58PM, Thu. Feb. 15, 2007
Austin Democratic Rep. Elliott Naishtat today filed HB 1534, which would create an affirmative defense to prosecution for pot possession by bona fide medi-pot patients. The bill is a reprisal of HB 658, which Naishtat filed in 2005 with co-sponsor Rep. Suzanna Gratia Hupp, R-Lampasas, and former Austin GOP Rep. Terry Keel (legislation that was itself a reprisal of a medi-mari bill Keel filed in 2001), and would put the onus on the patient defendant to prove their suffering – and that a doctor counseled about the use of medi-pot in order to alleviate said suffering – in order to enact the medi-mari defense, Naishtat said in a press release.
For sure, the bill is a far cry from medi-pot legalization, but it’s a good, solid start. Indeed, as it stands, a medi-pot patient could raise a medical defense to pot possession prosecution – such as the defense contemplated by Naishtat’s bill – but there’s no guarantee the court would allow it, which, to date, leaves patients vulnerable to the whims – and prejudices – of the criminal justice system.
HB 1534 would also ban law enforcement from taking initiating any “administrative, civil, or criminal investigation” of a licensed doc on the ground that the “physician discussed marihuana as a treatment option with a patient” or that the doctor “makde a written or oral statement that, in the physician’s opinion, the potential benefits of marihuana would likely outweigh the health risks for a particular patient.” (The bill inserts a similar provision into the state’s Occupations Code, to protect doctors from any disciplinary action related to counseling patients about medi-pot.)
There is “ample” evidence that medi-pot helps ease pain associated with cancer, multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, glaucoma and neurological disorders, Naishtat notes – indeed, just this week the results of a groundbreaking study out of the Univ. of California San Francisco were published in the journal Neurology, reporting that medi-pot successfully alleviated neurological distress in HIV-positive patients with fewer side effects than experienced with prescription pharmaceuticals.
The Texas Medical Association has adopted a policy supporting the right of doctors to discuss all treatment options with their patients – including medi-pot – without fear of professional and/or criminal reprisal, and numerous other organizations – including the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians and the New England Journal of Medicine – have also endorsed medicinal pot use. In the 2004 Texas Poll, 75% of respondents said they’d support legislation to allow medi-mari use by seriously ill patients – so far 12 states have done just that.
“It is clear to me that many patients and doctors feel the time has come for a full debate on this issue,” Naishtat said.
Amen to that.
Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.
A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.
Montinique Monroe, Feb. 23, 2017
May 22, 2014
Medical Marijuana, Elliot Naishtat, medi-pot