Did Congress Pass Monsanto Protection Act?

Food activists up in arms over biotech rider in HR 933

Last week, with a vote of 318 to 109, the House accepted the Senate’s amendments to HR 933. The Senate’s continuing resolution bill, formally known as the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, provides short-term funding to the federal government to the end of the fiscal year.

Intended to prevent the federal government from shutting down on March 27 when the current funding expires, HR 933 may seem an unlikely target for food activists. However, the trouble is in section 735. Smuggled into HR 933, the provision now being called the “Monsanto Protection Act,” essentially deregulates genetically modified organisms (GMOs) by allowing the U.S. Department of Agriculture to override judicial rulings and grant temporary permits for conventional farmers to plant and grow genetically modified crops while pending review. Previously, a court could suspend the planting and selling of genetically engineered crops if presented with a potential health or environmental risk or if not properly approved by the USDA. However, as legal battles persist, the “biotech rider” protects the ability of large biotech companies including Monsanto, Dow Chemical, and DuPont, to continue business as usual with the USDA’s blessing.

Food activists are calling for a presidential veto of the Monsanto Protection Act. “Passing the Monsanto Protection Act is the last straw for millions of Americans who are tired of being betrayed by their elected officials,” says Dave Murphy, founder and executive director of Food Democracy Now! “We’re calling on President Obama to stand up for family farmers and the Constitution and veto the Monsanto Protection Act.”

From increased pesticide usage and diminished crop yields over time to the veritable lack of safety testing, the only consolation for now is that HR 933 expires in six months. Undeniably, protecting biotech companies at the unknown expense of consumers and farmers is unconscionable; however, a veto is as likely as Monsanto feeding the world’s hungry.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Food Legislation
Outcome for Local Food Legislation
Outcome for Local Food Legislation
Senate approves Farm-to-Table Caucus bills

Anna Toon, May 24, 2013

Legislative Update
Legislative Update
Passage of bills spells progress for local food movement

Anna Toon, May 8, 2013

More by Anna Toon
To Have and to Eat
To Have and to Eat
A Chronicle food writer says goodbye to Austin

Dec. 31, 2015

Fanning the Flames
Fanning the Flames
Cultivo Salsa heats up

Aug. 21, 2015


Food Legislation, HR 933, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Senate, Congress, House of Representatives, Dave Murphy, Food Democracy Now!, Monsanto, biotech rider, Monsanto Protection Act, USDA, Genetically Modified Organisms, Genetically Engineered Crops

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Behind the scenes at The Austin Chronicle

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle