The Common Law

Don't Forget About the Supreme Court

Political pundits and talking heads seem to agree on at least one thing – this historic presidential election may be the most important in a generation. The election will define the American agenda from Main Street to Mecca and will set the country on a new course for addressing 21st century issues. Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain have focused the debate on the economic crisis, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a host of other domestic and foreign policy agenda items. But these issues, while extremely important and deserving of heated debate, have overwhelmed another significant issue for voters in this election – reshaping the U.S. Supreme Court.

Most constitutional scholars agree that a change in the court over the next four years is probable, with court watchers predicting that the next president could nominate anywhere from one to three new justices to the court. The anticipated departure of several of the justices can be attributed to several factors, including the advanced age of some of the justices (the average age on the court is 68, and six of the nine justices are older than 65). For example, many court watchers predict that neither Justice John Paul Stevens, 88, nor Justice Ruth Ginsberg, 75, both typically considered members of the court's liberal wing, will remain on the Supreme Court through the 2012 election.

The departure of even one justice on the Supreme Court could be enough to upset the delicate voting balance that has emerged in the court in recent years. The court will move further to the right if Sen. McCain wins the election. Alternatively, a vote for Sen. Obama would, depending on exactly which justice leaves the bench, make the court more liberal or at least maintain the status quo.

The economy and the war on terror have swamped the campaign landscape to such a degree that some voters are giving little, if any, serious consideration to how the next president will reshape the Supreme Court. The irony is that the reconfigured court will have the ability to affect our lives for decades after American military boots no longer tread on Middle Eastern soil and the economy has gone through more unexplainable peaks and valleys. The stakes for the Supreme Court are as great now as they have ever been, which makes it even more disappointing that not many people are talking about it.

Please submit column suggestions, questions, and comments to thecommonlaw@austinchronicle.com. Submission of potential topics does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information submitted is subject to being included in future columns.

Marrs, Ellis & Hodge LLP, www.jmehlaw.com.

The material in this column is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute, nor is it a substitute for, legal advice. For advice on your specific facts and circumstances, consult a licensed attorney. You may wish to contact the Lawyer Referral Service of Central Texas, a non-profit public service of the Austin Bar Association, at 512-472-8303 or www.austinlrs.com.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle