Our latest batch

In last week's story about the Supreme Court hearing arguments regarding the ban on "partial-birth" abortion, we incorrectly implied that Solicitor General Paul Clement told the justices that doctors who perform so-called "intact extraction" procedures have offered "cause-specific reasons" for choosing that procedure. In fact, Clement told the court that doctors have not offered specific reasons to explain why the procedure is ever necessary. As such, Clement argued, doctors use intact extraction only out of "preference." We regret the error.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Oops

June 12, 2020


June 22, 2018

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle