The Common Law

Employment law – wrongful termination

Can you explain what a wrongful termination suit is? When it comes down to he said/she said between an employer and employee, who does the law favor in a wrongful termination suit?

In Texas, as in most states, employment is governed by the "employment-at-will doctrine." This doctrine specifies that an employee or an employer may end the employment at any time without cause. Nevertheless, under certain conditions, an employee may sue an employer for termination, which creates what is called a "wrongful termination" lawsuit.

There are exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine, such as a written contract between the employer and employee, that allow the employer and employee to alter the employment relationship. Oral promises from the employer to the employee could also alter the employment-at-will doctrine in very limited circumstances. If the employer were to deviate from the written or oral contract by terminating an employee, then the employee could sue the employer for wrongful termination.

Some of the most common suits today are retaliatory termination suits. This is when an employee is fired for committing an act, within their rights, that the company did not like. A frequent current example involves workers' compensation claims. For example, sometimes an employee will file for workers' compensation, and then the company terminates their employment because they do not want to pay or were unhappy that the employee filed for workers' compensation.

Wrongful termination suits can also be sought if an employee was terminated based on their race or sex. Employees have also brought suits against their former employers for defamation, fraud, tortuous interference, and other related claims.

Texas courts generally do not favor wrongful termination suits, and many of these lawsuits are unsuccessful. In many cases, courts will defer to the employer's reasons for termination (because no cause is needed under the employment-at-will doctrine) unless the employee can bring strong evidence of ulterior motives that demonstrate wrongful termination.

Please submit column suggestions, questions, and comments to Submission of potential topics does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information submitted is subject to being included in future columns.

Marrs, Ellis & Hodge LLP,

The material in this column is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute, nor is it a substitute for, legal advice. For advice on your specific facts and circumstances, consult a licensed attorney. You may wish to contact the Lawyer Referral Service of Central Texas, a non-profit public service of the Austin Bar Association, at 512-472-8303 or

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle