Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare

Stephen Greenblatt on 'Will in the World'

Bard Ambition

The shelves groan with biographies that attempt to show us the man behind the ever-astonishing works of Shakespeare, so many that you'd think there can't possibly be anything left to add. And yet, the publication of Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare proved that there's still room for new portraits of the Bard. Harvard professor Stephen Greenblatt renders an extraordinarily vivid image of the playwright right down to the blood and bone, making original, captivating connections between Shakespeare's art and life. The book was a finalist for the National Book Awards, the National Book Critics Circle awards, and the Pulitzer Prize, among others. In advance of his visit to Austin to deliver the Thomas Cranfill Shakespeare Lecture at UT, the Chronicle spoke with Greenblatt about his book and the UT lecture, titled "Shakespeare and the Ethics of Authority."

Austin Chronicle: Why did the world need another Shakespeare biography?

Stephen Greenblatt: It probably didn't need in any desperate way another Shakespeare biography, but I and other people who love Shakespeare have the desire to know who this person was. This is the greatest writer of the last thousand years and maybe the greatest writer of the last several thousand years in the Western world, and it's irresistible to want to know who this person is. Certainly, the world didn't need another biography of Shakespeare as an enumeration of the known facts about him. There aren't that many of them, and that task has been extremely well-done now since the late 19th century. The question is how do you get from those facts to any imaginable human being, any face that you could see.

AC: What keys helped you to open that door?

SG: First, you have to master what's out there. But having said that, as I say in the book, you have to use your imagination. For me, there were two versions of this impetus, one slightly more glamorous than the other. The less glamorous but practical thing is that when I was editing The Norton Shakespeare and writing the general introduction, I allowed myself to fantasize about what kind of situations in the childhood of such a person could have triggered some of the things that he did. What it was like as a little boy to watch his father get dressed as a mayor of Stratford – or for that matter just to watch his father get dressed, that moment when you realize that people wear costumes. Just trying to imagine, without any evidence behind it except that his father was mayor and we know there were processions. Long before writing a biography, I thought about this, even though academics aren't supposed to be allowed to do this. But one can have occasional transgressions.

And then, as I've said in interviews, I had these conversations with Marc Norman, who was writing a screenplay about Shakespeare and wanted to know what he should use from Shakespeare's life. I said, "Forget it. There's nothing in the life that's interesting. Make a movie about something else." But he went on with Tom Stoppard to write the screenplay for Shakespeare in Love. The point is not that the film is historically accurate, because it obviously isn't, but that the film is based on the supposition that it wasn't only what Shakespeare read when he sat in his study that enabled him to write what he did. If you want to figure out how Shakespeare got from being the person who wrote Two Gentlemen of Verona, which is a good sort of workmanlike play that he wrote at the beginning of his career, to being a few years later the author of Romeo and Juliet, you have to start thinking about what his relationship to life was.

AC: What will "Shakespeare and the Ethics of Authority" be about?

SG: My lecture will take off from a peculiar conversation I had with none other than William Jefferson Clinton. I went to a reception at the White House in 1998 that a friend of mine had organized because he was poet laureate at the time, and I had an amazing conversation with Clinton about Shakespeare and whether there's an ethically adequate object for immense ambition. So my talk will start by thinking about whether Shakespeare thought there was such a thing as ethical adequacy in human ambition, an object of ambition that would satisfy you, not simply your lust for power but your feeling for justice.

AC: Are there characters who come close, or are we always looking at failed ambition?

SG: I think that on the whole Shakespeare was skeptical about – I mean, Shakespeare had a lot of different accounts about why you'd wind up ruling a country, including the account that we currently have, which is you're the son of someone else who ruled the country. So that I think Shakespeare would have found the current order of things exceedingly familiar, and if we'd told him it was the result of an election, he would've said, [in a skeptical tone] "Uh huh." [Laughs] In that sense, I don't think he would have been surprised. He might have been more surprised at our belief, which I cherish, that there should be something other than a geneological proximity to someone else who held power.

The other thing, as I will say in my talk, is I think that he thought that ruling was a fantastic, grinding effort. The idea that you could spend a lot of time on vacation as a ruler would have astonished him. That you could work out and sleep well and generally have a good time that way, I think he would've been flabbergasted by. Because over and over he depicts rule as an enormous burden, and an emblem of the burdensomeness of it is sleeplessness. To that extent, the current situation would have amazed him.


Stephen Greenblatt will speak on "Shakespeare and the Ethics of Authority" Monday, Oct. 10, at 7pm, in Jessen Auditorium (Rainey Hall) on the UT campus. The lecture is free and open to the public.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Book Reviews
<i>Presidio</i> by Randy Kennedy
Presidio by Randy Kennedy
For his debut novel, Kennedy creates a road story that portrays the harsh West Texas terrain beautifully and fills it with sympathetic characters.

Jay Trachtenberg, Sept. 14, 2018

Hunting the Golden State Killer in <i>I'll Be Gone in the Dark</i>
Hunting the Golden State Killer in I'll Be Gone in the Dark
How Michelle McNamara tracked a killer before her untimely death

Jonelle Seitz, July 20, 2018

More by Robert Faires
New Murals in Austin You May Have Missed
New Murals in Austin You May Have Missed
With murals sprouting across town like bluebonnets, here's a guide to some of the most notable new additions

April 3, 2020

How Austin Musician Gina Chavez Became the Subject of the City's Latest Mural
How Austin Musician Gina Chavez Became the Subject of the City's Latest Mural
The story of an L.A. muralist creating a 12-foot-tall portrait of a local musical star

April 3, 2020

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Will in the World:How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare, Stephen Greenblatt, National Book Awards, Pulitzer Prize, National Book Critic Circle awards, Thomas Cranfill Shakespeare Lecture, Shakespeare and the Ethics of Authority, Christopher Marlowe, The Norton Shakespeare, Marc Norman, Tom Stoppard, Shakespeare in Love

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle