Extending a Dance's Life: Deborah Hay

Deborah Hay forges her own answer to the issue of how one keeps choreography alive beyond one's own physical and mortal limitations with Nine Nights of Music in May, in which her solo "Music" is performed and adapted by four diverse artists.

Following her participation in Mikhail Baryshnikov's widely acclaimed Judson reunion performance and tour, Deborah Hay has returned to her work with a burning question: How does one keep choreography alive beyond one's own physical and mortal limitations? Choreographers have traditionally relied on a one-to-one relationship between themselves and performers. Put very simply, they have said: I show, you copy, I fix, you show correctly. This is how roles and choreography have been handed down for many, many years, and it works for techniques and dances that require specific movements to specific music -- ballet, for instance. It has an internationally accepted codified technique at the core that can be manipulated in a multitude of ways, but the basic steps are what they are. In fact, when teaching ballet-trained dancers, a choreographer has at his or her disposal the ability to characterize a movement as "like an assemble" and have the reference understood. From Varna, Bulgaria to Jackson, Miss., ballet dancers learn classical variations such as the "Don Quixote" grand pas de deux or the "Lilac Fairy" variation from Sleeping Beauty, which are memorized and performed to the exacting standards set by the choreographer. Any artistic interpretation must occur within strict boundaries.

But for modern dance, there is no internationally accepted codified body of technique, because each pioneer created his or her own. In the course of the 20th century, many dancer/choreographers chose to study diverse modern techniques and make use of the highly adaptable and differently bodied dancers that were increasingly available. Some, like the Judson set, rejected the very notion of "technique," and modern dance jumped its tracks, exploding into a multifaceted style, capable of housing radically differing techniques under one troubling and not-very-serviceable moniker. For the Judsonites, the process of archiving dances was questioned or abandoned altogether due to the limitations it placed on personal expression or the choreography's enforced evanescence. Historically, modern dance practitioners have prided themselves on personal interpretations of choreography and have had more artistic leeway than ballet dancers when it comes to varying the choreography. It is not unheard of for a modern dance choreographer to change the choreography to fit the body of the dancer. Is it, then, the same dance? Faced with different bodies of varying capabilities trained by multiple schools, one wonders how modern choreography will survive its original maker.

The bald truth is that it will change. Classical ballets and variations have been modified dramatically as technique sharpens, but we don't have any 400-year-old people around to point out the exact changes. We do have older dancers, dancemakers, and critics who perceive and report on subtle repertory changes during their lifetimes. Current modern choreographers, even ones who may have previously denounced archiving their choreography, are having to face up to the task of transmitting it to new dancers while preserving the original spirit of intent. Deborah Hay is forging her own answer to this issue with Nine Nights of Music in May, to be performed at the Mercury Hall by Hay and Steve Ausbury, Beverly Bajema, and Allison Orr, all experienced performers with impressive and varied pedigrees. Hay has taught the other three performers her solo, titled "Music," through the use of language, subtle direction, and the written word, and each performer has adapted it through daily practice for at least six months. Each solo will also be costumed differently and performed with music of the performer's choice or in silence. It offers audiences a rare opportunity to see one dance performed and adapted by four diverse artists. It is a brave choreographic experiment that joins the worldwide conversation about redefining intellectual property and artistic ownership. In order to answer her own question concerning the perpetuation of her choreographic legacy, Deborah Hay is giving it away to workshop participants -- one solo at a time.

Nine Nights of Music in May will be performed May 7-23, Tuesday-Thursday, at Mercury Hall, 615 Cardinal. No reservations. Call 462-0812 x1 for information.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More by Dawn Davis Loring
The Nutcracker
Ballet Austin's warm and decidely unstuffy production deserves to be a family holiday tradition

Dec. 21, 2012

Blue Lapis Light takes youth away from risk and on a journey

Dec. 14, 2012


Deborah Hay, Judson, Mikhail Baryshnikov, Nine Nights of Music in May, Steve Ausbury, Beverly Bajema, Allison Orr

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle