Disquiet Over Amphitheatres
Neighbors had hoped code changes would put the kibosh on neighboring amphitheatre
By Amy Smith, Fri., Feb. 1, 2013
A proposed city code amendment that would impose requirements on new amphitheatres in all zoning districts does not follow the intent of a resolution City Council passed last year. At least that's the opinion of a group of Oak Hill-area residents suing the city for its administrative approval of a Promiseland West Church site plan that includes the construction of a 1,000-seat-plus amphitheatre on its Dream City campus. The site is adjacent to residential neighborhoods.
The administrative approval of the amphitheatre occurred in 2008, but residents and many city staffers were unaware of that approval until 2011, just as the development battle was coming to a head.
Today (Jan. 31), the City Council is set to hold a hearing and possibly take action on the proposed code changes that the Planning Commission passed, with additional recommendations, in a 5-3 vote on Jan. 22.
At that meeting, Robert Kleeman, a resident of one of the neighborhood groups suing the city, took issue with the staff-written proposal that would designate amphitheatres as "conditional structures" in all zoning districts, requiring applicants to go through the Planning Commission instead of obtaining approval administratively. Kleeman reminded the commission that the Council's original resolution specifically designated amphitheatres as a "conditional use" as opposed to a "structure." He said, "An empty amphitheatre doesn't have an impact – it's the use."
Before moving the item to Council, the commission majority made some changes, including the removal of staff's recommended 100-person capacity threshold.
Promiseland neighbors had hoped the code amendments would also apply to the church's yet-to-be-constructed amphitheatre, but city Planning Manager Jerry Rusthoven said the church is grandfathered and wouldn't be required to go through the approval process again. "Right now, [Promiseland] is a permitted amphitheatre and this ordinance would not affect that," he said. If Council approves the proposal from staff, residents' best chances of recourse may rest with the courts.
FOLLOWUS
READMORE
amphitheatres, Promiseland West Church, City Council, Planning Commission, Robert Kleeman, Jerry Rusthoven
NEWS ARCHIVES »
TODAY’S EVENTS
Kylesa, Blood Ceremony
at Mohawk
O. Henry Pun-Off at O. Henry Museum
Final Cut: Ladies and Gentlemen at Alamo Drafthouse at the Ritz
MORE RECOMMENDED EVENTS »
MUSIC | FILM | ARTS | COMMUNITY
THELATEST
Finding Rail Route Complicated Michael King, in “The Reading Railroad”, while making valuable points, seems to state that finding an initial route for urban ...
Problems Facing Mueller Neighborhood leaders and members past and present of the city of Austin's Robert Mueller Advisory Commission (RMAC) deserve credit for ...
People Are the Real Mueller Story Through various media, we are subjected to stories of Mueller: the construction project. While that can be appreciated, Mueller's true ...
Keeping Austin Weird Things that keep Austin weird: 1) belief that one needs a train to get from UT to the state Capitol; ...
More Women on the Cover, Please How about putting a woman on the cover once in a while? The last eight issues have all featured men ...
MORE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR »
- Follow us@AustinChronicle
- Copyright © 1981-2013 Austin Chronicle Corp. All rights reserved.
- |
- Contact
- |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Advertise With Us





