Central Health Prop. 1: Opponents' Arguments

1) St. David's HealthCare

Argument: St. David's says the med school proposal misdirects funding that should be aimed directly at indigent care.

Response: Central Health says this is the best way to expand indigent care, and St. David's just objects to the financial terms for participation.

2) Travis County Taxpayers Union

Argument: Local property taxes are already too high, and the money could be better spent elsewhere.

Response: The med school/teaching hospital represents a unique opportunity – especially with the approval of Medicaid matching funds – to transform and expand local health care.

3) Steve Hall of StandDown Texas, Rabbi Kerry Baker, et al.

Argument: Seton HealthCare Family is a Catholic institution that does not provide birth control or abortion services.

Response: Central Health remains committed to birth control and reproductive services.

4) Environmentalist Mary Arnold of Save Muny

Argument: Unless UT agrees to preserve Lions Municipal Golf Course from commercial development, voters should reject the tax.

Response: The medical school project should not be held hostage to an unrelated issue.

NEWSLETTERS
AC Daily, Events and Promotions, Luvdoc Answers

Breaking news, recommended events, and more

Official Chronicle events, promotions, and giveaways

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)