TechnoLegeBacklash: Strama Slags Twitter
At least one legislator thinks Tweeting is for the birds
Rep. Mark Strama, D-Austin, has a reputation as a tech-savvy lawmaker. But it's his position on Twitter – the 140-characters-or-less messaging service that legislators love – that has the Lege all aflutter. As Rep. Joe Deshotel, D-Port Arthur, Tweeted to his 123 followers on March 31: "Rep Strama just called Twitter stupid in Public Ed Comm. I felt so ashamed of myself!"
So is the chair of the House Technology, Economic Development & Workforce Committee a secret technophobe? "I'm willing to entertain the possibility that I just don't get it because I'm old and out-of-touch," said Strama, 41, "but I think that Twitter is one of those things that people think is hip and cool, and then they look back, and it's this year's mullet."
Considering how easily accessible most information is, Strama said he couldn't work out exactly how the limited format of Twitter improves the situation. Take Gov. Rick Perry's March 12 announcement in Houston that he would be rejecting the federal unemployment insurance cash. Rather than wait for the press corps to Tweet it, Strama recalled, "I got a copy of his full speech in real-time from his website."
It's not that he's completely opposed to these newfangled forms of communication (aside from his official House and campaign websites, Strama is also on MySpace and Facebook). His prime concern is that they can open legislators to access in a bad way. "I find text messaging very valuable for my wife and I to coordinate making sure someone's taking care of our daughter while we're at work," he said. "I'm not so thrilled about getting texts from a lobbyist wanting help."
So why does he think so many lawmakers are Tweeting? "They're bandwagoning," he said. "It's like they're saying, 'I have to be on top of what's new and cool.' ... I may be wrong about whether it's cool or not, but it's not politically valuable." Rather than improving communication between lawmakers and constituents, Strama said he was concerned about politicians opening up their stream of consciousness through ill-considered and easily misinterpreted Tweets. "If we're expressing policy in 140 characters or less, that's the ultimate degradation of politics," he said (in 97 characters).
Jordan Smith, Amy Smith, Fri., April 19, 2013
Richard Whittaker, Fri., Feb. 8, 2013
Richard Whittaker, Fri., Jan. 25, 2013
Michael King, Fri., Dec. 14, 2012
Richard Whittaker, Fri., Dec. 7, 2012
Elizabeth Pagano, Fri., May 24, 2013
Fri., May 24, 2013
Michael King, Fri., May 24, 2013
Richard Whittaker, Fri., May 24, 2013
Jim Hightower, Fri., May 24, 2013
True Believers at Antone's
at The Scoot Inn
Lady for a Day at Paramount Theatre
Film Review Misses Mark Please make a note not to print any more movie reviews of big action movies by Kimberley Jones. She gets ...
What's the Big Deal? I'm baffled by this obsession with Mueller. I drove through it out of curiosity and it's a suburban nightmare that ...
No Mystery in School Bond Failures How out of touch has the Chronicle become with the voting populace of this city? From the article “Bonds: Death ...
Program Is Vital Resource I am responding to your article on ACCESS News, the program by and for the deaf and hard-of-hearing community. The ...
Finding Rail Route Complicated Michael King, in “The Reading Railroad”, while making valuable points, seems to state that finding an initial route for urban ...
- Follow us@AustinChronicle