Reproductive Rights Fight
South Dakota lawmakers set stage for most targeted attack on abortion rights since 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling; and Bush's proposed FY 2007 budget features cuts to women's and family planning programs
South Dakota already has stringent abortion laws indeed, the Sioux Falls Planned Parenthood is the state's sole abortion provider. Not surprisingly, the new law has angered reproductive-choice advocates, who are already gearing up for a court fight. "This ban is an attack on women's fundamental right of privacy and their ability to make the most intimate and personal choice about when and whether to have a child," said Planned Parenthood Staff Attorney Eve Gartner. "South Dakota's ban is the most sweeping abortion ban passed by any state in more than a decade. Planned Parenthood will go to court to ensure women, with their doctors and families, continue to be able to make personal health care decisions not politicians."
Ironically, as challenges to reproductive rights heat up in South Dakota, Texas, and elsewhere (see "The New Texas Family Planning," Jan. 27), President George W. Bush's administration seemingly clueless about the chasm between its anti-abortion stance and its repeated hamstringing of family-planning services floated a $2.77 trillion FY 2007 budget on Feb. 6 that features a host of cuts to both women's and family planning programs. Among the cuts are a $3 million reduction in Title X family-planning funds, which are administered through state grants; a $138 million cut for international family planning programs; a $7 million cut in the Maternal and Child Health Block Grant; and a shift of $250 million in funding for state programs that support "healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood." Cuts to other family assistance programs, like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (portions of TANF funding have traditionally been allocated to states for reproductive health/family planning services), will now fund a large part of the "healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood" programs.
The budget also proposed severe cuts to child welfare and child support enforcement programs. By contrast, Bush's abstinence education program is slated for a whopping $89.3 million raise in funding.
abortion rights, Reproductive health care, family planning, abortion, reproductive rights, George W. Bush, Roe v. Wade, U.S. Supreme Court, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, TANF, abstinence education, child welfare, child support enforcement, Maternal and Child Health Block Grant, Eve Gartner, Roger Hunt, abortion ban, Title X, Planned Parenthood