Traffic Jam for I-35 Makeover
The I-35 makeover idea has been around for nearly four years, since the city began charging for weekend nighttime parking on the lots. The lots actually belong to the Texas Department of Transportation which has for 40 years allowed the city to use the land under an interlocal agreement and the revenue collected has been duly kept separate and earmarked for improvements to TxDOT property. The coalition would like to see these funds at last accounting, over $100,000 spent according to a plan to be crafted by the community and approved by TxDOT for improved lighting, streetscapes, and other enhancements. So far, buy-in has been extensive. Supporters include both neighborhood planning teams (Central East Austin, chaired by this reporter, and East Cesar Chavez) and other neighbor groups on the east side of I-35, as well as the Downtown Austin Alliance, the city Downtown Commission, and Mayor Will Wynn and council members Raul Alvarez, Danny Thomas, and Brewster McCracken.
So if everyone thinks this is a great idea, where's the problem? Heretofore, the major difference has been between the coalition's community-driven approach and the apparent preference of the city's Building Services Department, which oversees the lots, for pursuing an in-house solution. The proposed contract, though, turns what could have been a philosophical difference into a practical one, since under its terms Houston-based Ampco would be paid substantially more to operate the I-35 lots than the city currently spends, thus reducing the revenue stream for any makeover project.
The Ampco contract, in fact, is for the management of not just the I-35 lots, but also the parking garage underneath the new City Hall and the surface parking at One Texas Center. In a memo to the City Council, leaders of the coalition claim that the contract would pay Ampco a significantly higher fee-per-space to manage the I-35 facility than the City Hall garage, even though the latter will clearly be more expensive to operate. "The numbers that are presented create a scenario where the I-35 lots subsidize the operation of the City Hall parking garage," reads the memo. "This is functionally the same as taking revenue from the TxDOT property to subsidize the General Fund. Not only does this violate the city's agreement with TxDOT, but ... it squanders any opportunity to transform the I-35 underpass."
The coalition is asking the council to separate I-35 from the overall Ampco contract, and notes that it has received letters of interest from local parking operators willing to provide their services at a deep discount to allow more funds to go to the makeover project. Makeover backers have also approached state Sen. Gonzalo Barrientos to get involved and have plans to meet with TxDOT officials in September to get a green light on the effort if it still exists by then.
Virginia B. Wood, Fri., Oct. 26, 2012
Josh Rosenblatt, Fri., Oct. 12, 2012
Rachel Feit, Fri., May 25, 2012
Richard Whittaker, Fri., Jan. 21, 2011
Wells Dunbar, Fri., May 4, 2007
True Believers at Antone's
at The Scoot Inn
Lady for a Day at Paramount Theatre
Film Review Misses Mark Please make a note not to print any more movie reviews of big action movies by Kimberley Jones. She gets ...
What's the Big Deal? I'm baffled by this obsession with Mueller. I drove through it out of curiosity and it's a suburban nightmare that ...
No Mystery in School Bond Failures How out of touch has the Chronicle become with the voting populace of this city? From the article “Bonds: Death ...
Program Is Vital Resource I am responding to your article on ACCESS News, the program by and for the deaf and hard-of-hearing community. The ...
Finding Rail Route Complicated Michael King, in “The Reading Railroad”, while making valuable points, seems to state that finding an initial route for urban ...
- Follow us@AustinChronicle