• newsletters • best of austin • find a paper • submit an event • advertise with us • contact • jobs •
HOME: OCTOBER 20, 2006: BOOKS
text size

Readings

BY JESS SAUER


Real Sofistikashun

by Tony Hoagland

Graywolf, 201 pp., $15 (paper)

There are many people who dislike poetry and still more who claim to simply not get it. Many poets have grappled with this truth and attempted to change things by suggesting that poetry is vital, that without it "men die miserably every day," as William Carlos Williams once wrote.

Unfortunately, this defense aims to convince people to read poetry based on its (spiritual) nutritive qualities. It's a pointless, parental approach. Rarely is "Eat this, it's good for you" as persuasive as "Try this, you might like it." You can't persuade or shame or scare someone into liking poetry. It's too bad, as many writers could better spend their time addressing the people who already love poetry rather than trying to convert those who don't – people who, I would assume, are unlikely to be reading books on poetry in the first place.

Tony Hoagland's book of essays doesn't waste a second on justifying himself or poetry. He doesn't preach to the choir; he sings with it. In the personable foreword to Real Sofistikashun, Hoagland writes that his essays are "neither academic nor exactly for the person off the street. ... They are intended for the reader who loves poems and likes to think about them. My hope is that these pieces show one person trying to think through certain topics, and that the step-by-step process of thinking will be helpful. ... No program or prescription for American poetry is being argued here."

His hopes are fully realized. Real Sofistikashun makes no attempts to validate the form or to announce itself as a contender for the critical canon. Hoagland doesn't try to set criteria for what makes a poem good or bad and readily acknowledges that taste may preclude the possibility of one. In discussing Wallace Stevens, he writes, "There are so many kinds of excess in Stevens to admire; or, depending on your temperament, to dislike." His writing is accessible, his tone approachable – likable, even. Each essay has the easy energy and flow of a conversation with a truly passionate person. When explaining or proposing an idea, he pulls books off his shelves to illustrate his points, and those looking for exposure to new poets will have a much better time with this book than randomly thumbing through an anthology. Real Sofistikashun is remarkably encouraging as a barometer of poetry today, worth a hundred defenses and more convincing than any of them.


MORE BOOK REVIEWS IN THIS ISSUE
 
  • Real Sofistikashun
    Tony Hoagland's book of essays doesn't waste a second on justifying himself or poetry

  • Why Moms Are Weird
    Pamela Ribon's second entry into what might be a "Weird" franchise, a Sweet Valley High for the savvy Internet set

Share Digg Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us LinkedLn Email Print article


POST A COMMENT

(optional):
:

Permission to Print. Letter to the editor.
 
FURTHER READING
Keywords
for this story
Real Sofistikashun
Tony Hoagland
Graywolf

Really White Vigilante

BLOGS
East Riverside, The Master Plan
What's Your Mobility Fix?
White vs. Shami, Round One

What's Your Mobility Fix?
Give Us Your Best Roundhouse Kick to the Head
Mobility and You

ARCHIVES
More from
October 20, 2006
News
Arts
Books
Food
Screens
Music
Columns
Sports

Browse the
Archives by
Issue
Author
Column
Review
Section


Short Story Party
Sound Wars
Mind Over Music
Online Contests
Chrontourage
Chronicle Merch

 

Ads of the Day