• newsletters • best of austin • find a paper • submit an event • advertise with us • contact • jobs •

Thompson to Dukes: See Ya in Court 

 Thu Feb 28, 2:22pm , 2008


Thompson (l) and Dukes at last month's Democratic forum lunch. Aaaaawkward.
Photo by Richard Whittaker
Breaking News: House District 46 hopeful Brian Thompson is so mad at Rep. Dawnna Dukes campaign ads claiming he never voted in Travis County that he's seeking an injunction to stop them running.

This comes down to a Dukes TV ad in which she claims Thompson "never even bothered to vote. Ever." (He did, and he even has Texas Democratic Party documents to prove it.) Thompson says that he saw the ads, and contacted KXAN, KVUE, KEYE, KTBC, the Austin-American Statesman and Time Warner Cable, to tell them the ads were not true. He told Dukes at a Cherrywood Neighborhood Association on Feb. 20 that he had just early-voted in the primary, so it wasn't true. He sent her a letter saying, stop running the ad, or we'll see you in court. She hasn't stopped running the ad, so he's looking for a Travis County judge and hopes to get a hearing before the end of the week.

On-screen, the ad sources (not quotes) an Statesman article that "Brian Thompson has never voted in a Texas Democrat (sic) Primary, until this year, EVER!" But the voice-over says "Dukes and Democrats defeated the Delay/Craddick pan to cripple minority representation for Texas. Her opponent? Well, he never even bothered to vote. Ever." Individually, these statements may be true (although how Dukes expected Thompson to vote against redistricting when he wasn't in the Lege is a bit baffling.) But together?

Check below the fold for the ad.

 

FEATURED IN STATE
Photo by Jana Birchum
Earle Goes NXNW
Michael King, Tue Jan 19
Dem lite guv hopeful makes his case at Sherlock's
 
MORE IN NEWS
Primary Filings: The Democrats
Richard Whittaker, Tue Jan 5
Breaking down the election filings for the Dems
Share Digg Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us LinkedLn Email Print article
COMMENTS
2
 
Aren't voting records private SD Feb 29, 2008 - 08:18 am
Seems to me that how a person votes in an election is privileged and private. So it would appear that this information was leaked by someone in Travis County? Probably Duke's cohorts over Nelda Spear's office (or more likely Spears herself). Another reason it's time for a change in the tax office.


They are not private Lee Nichols Feb 29, 2008 - 11:16 am
SD: No, the records to which Dukes refers are not private. The part of voting that is secret is WHO you voted for. But whether you voted, and in which primary you voted, are public record.




POST A COMMENT

(optional):
:

Permission to Print. Letter to the editor.
 

 

 


Short Story Party
Sound Wars
Mind Over Music
Online Contests
Chrontourage
Chronicle Merch

 

Ads of the Day


FEATURED POSTS
A Super Bowl to Remember
Mark Fagan, Mon Feb 8
Who Dat nation rejoices
Texies and the City
Richard Whittaker, Sun Feb 7
Council's new partnership with flat-track Roller Derby league (video)
Videos: Spoon and the Strange Boys
Austin Powell, Fri Feb 5
"Written in Reverse" and "Be Brave"
Powers on the Spot
Richard Whittaker, Fri Feb 5
Footage from the UT budget town hall [video]
This Week's Waste of Time
James Renovitch, Thu Feb 4
A free online game lets the lasers fly.


MOST POPULAR
Photo courtesy of University of Texas Department of Student Affairs
UT Axing Cactus Cafe, Informal Classes
Richard Whittaker, Sun Jan 31
Union board "phasing out" two campus institutions in August
We Forgive You, Notre Dame. Just Don't Do It Again.
Steven Cheslik-deMeyer, Tue Jan 26
Notre Dame student paper prints hateful cartoon.
Hustlers: London or Bust
Richard Whittaker, Sat Jan 30
Texas Rollergirls kick off fundraising drive with silent auction
Photo by Jana Birchum
White vs. Shami, Round One
Richard Whittaker, Mon Feb 8
Who won the Democratic governor's debate? (UPDATED)
Give Us Your Best Roundhouse Kick to the Head
Belinda Acosta, Wed Jan 27
Deets on local auditions for the new reality show The Next Dragon