• newsletters • best of austin • find a paper • submit an event • advertise with us • contact • jobs •
HOME: NOVEMBER 20, 2009: NEWS
text size

No Wastewater in the Lake, Please

BY LEE NICHOLS

With Lake Austin and Tom Miller Dam as a backdrop, a group of local elected officials and business leaders gathered last Friday morning to voice their opposition to a petition by the cities of Leander and Granite Shoals to lift the ban on discharging treated wastewater into the Highland Lakes. The two cities filed the petition with the Texas Com­mis­sion on Environmental Quality to save money on a new water treatment plant being built. At press time Wednesday, the TCEQ denied the petition.

Led by Austin state Rep. Valinda Bolton, the area officials, including Austin Mayor Lee Leffingwell, Lakeway Mayor Dave DeOme, and others, said they opposed the petition because Lake Travis serves as a source of drinking water for the region. Bolton said that although treatment removes bacteria, it does not remove nitrogen and phosphorous, which act as fertilizer that can spawn algae blooms. Instead, she said, the effluent should be sprayed onto lawns, golf courses, and other green spaces where fertilizer is welcomed. "While we may not be in control of when, or even if, water will pour from the heavens, it is within our power to control the quality of our water," Bol­ton said. "Since the 1980s, there has been a ban on discharging effluent into the High­land Lakes, and as a result, Lake Travis is ranked as one of the four clearest lakes in Texas."

She pointed out that if the ban is lifted, it would not apply solely to Leander and Gran­ite Shoals – the 34 permitted wastewater treatment facilities in the Lake Travis watershed potentially could discharge. (Only one has a grandfathered permit to do so.) "These cities do not need the ban to be lifted in order to provide water to their citizens or treat their discharge," Bolton said. "Their desire to keep costs for the new facility down by just $4 million does not justify endangering the health of the lake, the health and livelihood of our citizens, or the health of our businesses, both small businesses and major employers."

"We want to be treated like every other city and every other watershed in Texas," Granite Shoals Mayor Frank Reilly responded to the Chronicle. "This ban only exists in the High­land Lakes. I would hope that if the TCEQ grants our permit, they would do so with strict limits, unlike those that the city of Aus­tin has, which are not at all strict." (Austin discharges into the Colorado River, but Bolton contends that sending treated water into a moving river doesn't pose the same problems as a standing lake intended to provide drinking water.) Reilly says his community of 5,000 northwest of Austin is currently mostly on septic tanks, and that asking a small community to absorb the extra costs is simply not feasible. And if the ban gets lifted, he said, "it's lifted for everyone to have the opportunity to apply to the TCEQ for a permit to discharge ... which would require public hearings, the full-blown process."

Share Digg Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us LinkedLn Email Print article


POST A COMMENT

(optional):
:

Permission to Print. Letter to the editor.
 
See our
Elections
page

for more
coverage.

FURTHER READING
More about
wastewater
Don't Spray It! 'Bad' Effluent Threatens Hill Country June 20, 2008
Spraying treated sewage over the aquifer isn't cool

Keywords
for this story
wastewater
TCEQ
Granite Shoals
Leander

Deep Focus
Energy and Environment

Really White Vigilante

BLOGS
White vs. Shami, Round One
Re-Dunking the Tea Bag
Texies and the City

'A' Is for Axed: Cactus Gets Chopped, Classes Get Cut
White vs. Shami, Round One
Neon Genesis Evangelion: End of Evangelion

ARCHIVES
More from
November 20, 2009
News
Arts
Books
Food
Screens
Music
Columns
Sports

Browse the
Archives by
Issue
Author
Column
Review
Section


Short Story Party
Sound Wars
Mind Over Music
Online Contests
Chrontourage
Chronicle Merch

 

Ads of the Day