• newsletters • best of austin • find a paper • submit an event • advertise with us • contact • jobs •
HOME: SEPTEMBER 25, 2009: NEWS
text size

Panhandlers for God

Not all street solicitors are created equal – some owe their souls to the company church

BY JORDAN SMITH



Illustration by Jason Stout

Local radio talk-show host Charlie Hodge was driving to work one morning in late 2007 when he first encountered the Austin Restor­ation Ministries.

Hodge is one-third of the three-man, four-hour KLBJ-FM Dudley & Bob Morning Show and returns to the station for an hourlong midday chat with listeners on The Charlie Hodge Half-Time Show. Just before Christmas, a few weeks after he started hosting the noontime program, he was waiting at a red light at Rundberg and I-35, brainstorming a catchy intro for that day's show. He wasn't paying much attention to what was around him: just sitting, listening to the radio, staring at the red light, and thinking.

"I do these little [introductions] every day, like [David] Letterman: 'It's The Charlie Hodge Half-Time Show, starring the man who – dot, dot, dot,' and I make up a new sentence every day," Hodge recalled recently. "And I'm sitting there thinking, and all of a sudden I feel my car moving" from side to side, "and this woman ... has been shouting at me through my window. And when I didn't acknowledge her, she shook my car. ... I thought, what the hell?" Hodge shot her a look, but she didn't back off. Instead she started cursing at him and waving a small piece of white paper in front of his face. She was doing "righteous work," he recalled her saying, for God – the details of which were printed under the banner "ARM" and "AUSTIN Restoration Minis­tries" in black ink on a small, scissor-cut piece of white paper that she held in her hand. "I'm trying to show you what I'm preaching about trying to get people off ... drug use," he said she told him.

Hodge was pissed – and, he acknowledges, a little scared. "I was a little bit frightened," he said. "Not to flush my man card or anything, but I was. I was like, 'What the hell is going on?'" Certainly, the encounter didn't make him feel charitable. But Hodge was minutes from airtime, and though he was mad, he tried to brush it off.



An Austin Restoration Ministries solicitor on the job
Photo by Jana Birchum

That was that – or so he thought. Instead, his encounters with ARM's aggressive solicitors in the Rundberg/I-35 area had just begun. Until that morning in 2007, Hodge admits that he just wasn't aware of aggressive panhandling, which is illegal within Austin city limits. "I was pretty ignorant of the issue," he said. Before starting the Half-Time Show, Hodge would head to work before dawn and head home just after 10am – not prime solicitation time. But as he began to look around the North Austin neighborhood where he works, what he saw alarmed him.

As he headed daily back and forth along the corridor along I-35 between Highway 183 and Rundberg, he began to see the armies of ARM everywhere – and it wasn't long before he had yet another off-putting encounter with one of the group's members. That time, a woman carrying ARM leaflets actually sprawled on the hood of his car to get his attention. On another occasion he saw an ARM solicitor reach inside a car in front of his when the driver didn't respond to the solicitation for cash.

The developing situation made him increasingly angry; he wanted to talk about it on-air, but he didn't want to come off as "the angry guy" – the noon show is about fun bits and gut laughs, not cranky ranting. In the end, Hodge decided that he'd talk about the ARM solicitors by coining a new name for their specific behavior and aggressive actions: Intimidatosaurus rex. And so it went. For months. But then a funny thing started to happen: More and more, Hodge wasn't the one describing on-air ARM's Intimidatosaurus solicitors; his listeners were. "There was a tipping point," Hodge recalls. Suddenly callers were reporting sightings of ARM solicitors all across Austin – from Parmer Lane to Ben White Boulevard, and even outside of Austin, from Elgin to San Marcos. "It dawned on me," Hodge recalled, "wait a minute, these aren't just a bunch of individuals who got together and said, 'Hey, let's get organized and make money for ourselves and make this our job.'"

Not Santa Claus

Indeed, according to the small leaflets ARM solicitors hand out to drive-by donors, the group promises "TOTAL RESTORATION IS POSSIBLE," for anyone with "family problems, problems with drugs, alcohol" – all of whom are invited, free of charge, to ARM's "restoration homes for men and women." The group accepts all manner of donations – "cash, Tv's cars, homes etc," and according to its website, the group's "target" is the "Drug Addicted," with the goal of restoring "Addicts and Their Families." The Ministries' dream? To save 1 million addicts "through the Gospel of Jesus Christ." Worthy goals, perhaps, but the visible means to those ends, thought Hodge – aggressive solicitation that runs afoul of the law – are nonetheless curious. "They claim to be a legitimate organization, and from what I can see [they] get the lion's share of their revenue from aggressively intimidating citizens and say they're going to use it for drug rehabilitation? It just made me suspicious," Hodge said. For Hodge (and, with the slow burn of radio, a growing number of his listeners) there arose one overriding question: Who and what is the Austin Restoration Ministries?

As it happens, Hodge and his listeners aren't the only ones asking that question. Comments and questions about ARM activities have popped up online in various places – an aside in a personal blog and another in a local atheist newsletter and, most tellingly, on the website for GuideStar, which provides information about charitable organizations. A GuideStar reviewer cautioned people against giving ARM any money: "This group puts its people back onto the streets – literally," he wrote in July.

Aside from a smattering of Web mentions, however, information about the group is very thin. According to records filed with the secretary of state, ARM was incorporated in Austin in 2006 as a nonprofit group – the IRS confirms that the group does have 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status – "organized to propagate the Christian faith and to advance a 'move of God' among all people" that would operate "charitable service centers" for the homeless and hungry and "provide rehabilitation and spiritual guidance for persons addicted to the use of drugs and narcotics." How and where those rehabilitative services are rendered isn't at all clear. The organization has two Austin properties listed as addresses for its directors – one on Lamar Boulevard, just north of 183, and one just south of Rundberg Lane – but neither is owned by the group, and on numerous visits while reporting this story, no one was observed at either property. On its website, the group says it operates two group homes – one for men and another for women – but no addresses are listed. The website lists Sheila and Lee Price as the group's pastors (the couple is also listed on secretary of state documents as ARM directors) – but neither leader responded to numerous Chronicle requests for an interview.

After several inquiries, we finally reached board member Azor Barnes, who said, "We target drug addicts and alcoholics, rehabilitate them, and bring them back to their families." Right now, he said, 42 men and 23 women are living in ARM's two group homes. Barnes said the money raised from soliciting is used to pay all the residents' costs for living, food, and personal hygiene.

More disturbing is the fact that ARM is not licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services to operate a drug rehabilitation program, nor has it filed the necessary paperwork to operate a faith-based drug rehab program. (Barnes said he wasn't aware of the state requirements but that he will "look into it." Based on questions from the Chron­icle, DSHS officials have said they would investigate the group's status.) That means that the group is not one that local agencies administering substance-abuse services – including Austin Travis County Mental Health Mental Retardation – refer clients to for treatment.

Certainly, getting addicts to the point that they're ready to undertake rehab is a difficult process, says Kenneth Placke, director of ATCMHMR's behavioral health services. On average, said ATCMHMR spokeswoman Iliana Gilman, it takes five tries over five years to "recover" from addiction. While there are certainly successful faith-based rehabilitation programs – think Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anony­mous – ARM is not on the local treatment community's radar for services. Indeed, of the people involved in treatment services contacted by the Chronicle, none was familiar with the group's treatment efforts – but several were familiar with the group, because, like Hodge and his listeners, they'd seen members on corners handing out the little white leaflets in exchange for a "donation."

So ARM claims to be helping people but, for all intents and purposes, has no public presence or reputation for doing so. If ARM's goal is getting people off drugs, is putting them on street corners to solicit money an effective (and acceptable) way to do that? And where exactly does the money go? If ARM is actually a charitable way to help people, it surely doesn't come across that way, says Hodge. "The Red Cross, their main revenue stream is not panhandling, and if it were it would be set up like [the Salvation Army's] Santa Clauses, outside a store, ringing a bell: You see 'em, and if you feel like giving, you give," he said. "They're very clearly marked on what they're raising money for."

Making the Quota

From the available documents, it certainly isn't clear what ARM raises money for or what happens to that money. Generally the tax returns of charitable organizations are available for public inspection, but because ARM is a faith-based organization, there is no public IRS trail. Still, it does appear that the group is collecting money – and doing so in a manner that violates city ordinances governing street-side solicitation.

According to city ordinance, aggressive panhandling "includes approaching or following pedestrians, repetitive soliciting despite refusals, the use of abusive or profane language to cause fear and intimidation, unwanted physical contact, or the intentional blocking of pedestrian and vehicular traffic." (Unlike other Texas cities, including San Antonio, Austin does not require solicitors for charities to obtain a permit to work the city's corners.)

As a class C misdemeanor offense, aggressive panhandling is punishable by a fine of up to $500 for each offense (plus $68 in court costs). From January through July 31, Austin Police handed out 297 citations for aggressive panhandling at locations all around Austin – how many of those were written to ARM solicitors isn't certain, because APD does not collect that type of information when writing citations. But that doesn't mean that APD isn't aware of ARM's solicitation practices, says department spokesman Cpl. Scott Perry. Indeed, Perry says that APD street officers are very familiar with ARM's activities.

One officer told Perry that he writes "gobs" of tickets to ARM members in the very neighborhood near the KLBJ studio where Hodge works. On the first day that the officer switched from the night to the day shift, Perry said, he wrote 11 tickets. "He constantly deals with them," Perry said. "Every shift he writes tickets." Occasionally, he takes solicitors to jail, when the fines associated with those tickets haven't been paid and they turn into warrants. Over time, Perry says, officers have learned a little bit more about ARM's operations: Mon­day through Thursday, ARM solicitors have told police, they are required to give the first $75 they make to the "church" – any money they make beyond that belongs to them. On Friday and Saturday the church's take increases to $100, says Perry. And arrests barely cause a hiccup in the operation: As soon as they're out, they're back on the corner.

According to Barnes, Perry's account isn't accurate. Instead, he said, "All of the funds donated to the church are used to meet the residents' needs."

Given the setup, it is hard to imagine how working for ARM would help individual solicitors get a leg up, when the church appears to be amassing most (or all) of whatever wealth is generated from the street corner activities. Indeed, it is hard also to know how standing on street corners requesting donations has any connection to, or would actually help, individuals to kick addiction.

In response, Barnes said that he himself had been rehabilitated by the ministry and that the church maintains an "open-door policy – anyone should feel free to come in and see how the ministry operates."

On the street at least, the policy doesn't seem quite so open. Approached at the intersection of 183 and I-35, an ARM solicitor among a group working the corner responded, "We're not allowed to talk to reporters."

The Order of the Corner

None of this particularly surprises Hodge, who says ARM's Intimidatosauruses don't behave like other individual solicitors. Some­times Hodge will "decide to fold up a dollar for a guy to come take who holds up a sign that says, 'God Bless, I'm a Vet.' He's standing there, and when he sees you with the money, it's an activated response," he says. "He comes to you. But going up to each car and forcing them to pay attention to you and soliciting a response or getting more and more aggressive when you attempt to ignore them, which is your right ... that's kind of the differentiating point, [from] the silent contract we have" with solicitors. That observation mirrors comments individual solicitors made to researchers from the University of Texas' Center for Social Work Research, which did a study on public solicitation in Austin, submitted to the city in December 2008. The study was of individual solicitors and not of those soliciting for "charitable organizations"; still, the authors noted that "there appeared to be one organization predominately engaged in this activity. The Austin Restoration Ministries was the organization most frequently observed at the solicitation sites and comments from respondents indicated that there was some tension between solicitors from this organization and individual solicitors."

Indeed, Beth Bruinsma Chang, a post-doctoral fellow who worked on the study, said that researchers did not "specifically ask about ARM. People, of their own volition ... just named ARM. ... It just kept coming up." Researchers were told that when ARM solicitors come to a corner, they aren't mindful of the "etiquette of soliciting," and that causes tension. ARM solicitors "disrupted the social order" by jumping in, failing to respect or follow the rules of the corner, Bruinsma Chang said.

That observation clearly fits Hodge's experience – and those of his listeners, who have continued to call in with stories of encounters with ARM members. "Part of the reason I keep harping on this is ... it takes real emotion. I actually got a bit frightened, and I feel a bit unsafe about the way they operate," he says. "You know, honestly, when I think about it with a cool head and I haven't just been ... intersection-assaulted, I think if they want to stand on a corner, fine. If they want to hold a sign that has the information from their organization, fine. But just stand there. ... And if people choose to give you money, that's their own ... mistake," he continued. But he also finds it hard to believe that ARM and its members certainly don't already know, "every single one of them," that what they're doing is "against the law ... and they're doing it anyway."



'An Attitude of Christian Love'

From the Austin Restoration Ministries' articles of incorporation:

"By avoiding evil of every kind, such as profanity, intoxicating liquors, harmful world pleasures, dishonesty, immorality, and all sinful habits; by seeking to do good to both the bodies and souls of men, feeding, clothing, and visiting those in need as the opportunity presents itself; by being faithful to the known ordinances such as regular Church attendance, the Sacra­ment of the Lord's Supper, consistent with Bible Study, daily Family prayers, and private devotion; by faithfully supporting the Local Church through God's financial plan of tithing and offerings, and by contributing, according to ability, to the various Missionary Programs of the Church, with the desire to lead people to Christ; by working together in harmony and unity with the fellowship for the advancement and growth of the visible church, in all things showing forth an attitude of Christian love until Jesus comes."

Share Digg Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us LinkedLn Email Print article
COMMENTS
8
 
"Charlie Hodge, you're my hero" LittleNick Sep 25, 2009 - 05:59 am
'Tip of the sword', man.

(By the by, Intimodatosaurus Rexi do not respond well when told to "suck or run")



In San Antonio too MaxFrisson Sep 26, 2009 - 10:04 am
About 3 weeks ago this group was working the corner at Bandera Rd. & Loop 1604, just south of Helotes. They were running between cars and forcing this same small flyer in cars. Next time I see them I am going to call SAPD because I doubt they have proper permits.

I find this thing about walking between rows of cars to solicit donations to be a very unsafe practice. I almost hit a kid once in a little league uniform as he ran though traffic on a multi-lane divided highway. Seems like a city traffic law to prohibit walking between lanes of stopped traffic would be a good move.



Nothing Fails Like Success mnpoor Sep 26, 2009 - 11:23 am
One could start with the assumption that each solicitor gets a $1 contribution every five minutes. This should produce $12 per hour. A solicitor 'on the job' for 8 hours per day yields $24,000 per year.

Housing four drug addicts in a two bedroom apartment might cost $200 per month each. The cost of food may or may not be material, since there may be another charitable channel providing at least some assistance. These people are probably carried around in vans or converted school buses, so they aren't having to pay down car principal, gas, or insurance. Cell phones might cost $30 per month, and some utility bills, perhaps another $50 per month per person. Such a person will 'cost' no less than $300 per month, or $3600 per year. Subtracting $4000 per person from $24,000 per person yields a nice round $20,000. $1 million divided by $20,000 is 50 people.

Since these are contributions to a non-profit, no taxes are involved. One other 'cost', however, might be the church's tolerance of drug use, in which certain amounts of the money are diverted to recreational chemicals. The 'social contract', in this case, is 'leave us to our vices, and we'll share the take'.

There appears to be a positive feedback cycle, since this activity has continued to grow for years. As it becomes larger, it attracts progressively more attention, mostly negative. Lots of money piling up in one place attracts flies, and eventually, federal investigators. One can foresee an eventual armed standoff of the Mt. Carmel variety if the center of this web is actually zealous, otherwise a few people show up in court one day in jumpsuits. The situation is probably already out of control, and the end is just a matter of time.


Part of a Larger Trend NickHentschel Sep 27, 2009 - 07:45 pm
As alarming as ARM's behavior is, it isn't exactly "news," at least to me. Instead, it fits in with an increasing pattern of hostility that I'm suddenly observing from Austin's homeless, chiefly on Guadalupe St. Over the past month or so, I have had at least THREE encounters with homeless people who were not only confrontational, but in some cases even suggested a willingness to pick a fight, simply because I said "no" too forcefully for their taste. Indeed, some approach in just such a way as to provoke a fight! One young man literally snuck up behind me to ask for a cigarette, south of the library, and then when he saw my scared, angry refusal, started screaming at me. He hollered, "Kiss my ass!", called me names, and even made fun of my appearance, and the bicycle I was riding! Another man I'd refused tried to get right in my face in the parking lot at Vitamin Cottage, and I suspect that only the fact that I turned and rode away, ASAP, saved me from a confrontation. And a third seems to have faked a tantrum at the Faulk Library, as a pretext to a panhandling "apology." Aggression seems to simply be a new trend in Austin's homeless, a new tool in some panhandlers' arsenals. I would propose that ARM has simply provided some of these people with an outlet.


@ "Part of a larger trend" JeremyWells Sep 29, 2009 - 12:06 pm
I think there is a big difference between the "drag rats" and the rest of the non-affiliated solicitors. The aggression is different from ARM's too. I've always noticed that the drag rat solicitors on Guadalupe in general have a more confrontation, aggressive, even mean-spirited approach than the older solicitors operating along 35 and its various corridors. True, it is no less scary or dangerous than the tactics of ARM, but the phenomenon of aggressive drag rats and ARM solicitors shouldn't be extended to the homeless population at large


WE ARE ONLY AS STRONG AS OUR WEAKEST LINKS LeslieDiaz Sep 29, 2009 - 02:06 pm
I would hope that everyone reading this article realizes that we, as a society, are DEMANDING that the "homeless" and those who fall through the cracks "Act a Particular Way." This type of attitude not only reveals that we believe that the system is flawless, but that we expect those who weren't privileged with a good support system should shut their mouths and not make any waves. The status quo is not OK. A true democracy allows groups that are disadvantaged to make their voices heard. We should interpret this tension at street corners as just another example of the fact that the system needs change. Also, as witnesses to the injustices that our system perpetuates, our inaction equals negligence. It is our responsibility as citizens to recognize that anger towards the disadvantaged will only hurt our society. We must remember that the disadvantaged are CREATED, we share the responsibility in rectifying injustices. VIVA!


It's not about "acting a certain way" wetmango Sep 29, 2009 - 07:57 pm
LeslieDiaz, have you ever encountered an ARM solicitor? This is a "religious organization" (a registered non-profit at that) and their memembers who solicit for your donations are EXTRAORDINARILY AGGRESSIVE. The entire article isn't about the fact that we all would rather not have to deal with panhandlers or have them act a certain way. I'm speaking firsthand and, like most readers who have been on North Lamar, Anderson Mill/183, and Burnet/183, we can swap horror stories all day.


more likely a case of poor organizational skills DaveBrown Sep 29, 2009 - 09:46 pm
We could get all up in arms about something like this, but I sorta share Leslie's view on one level. ARM solicitors obviously upset the cart a bit on the corners, and I see them up here (north 35) regularly, but the ARM people I encounter, while a little more aggressive than individual solicitors, haven't ever outright harassed me. Regardless, on the larger scale, from what I read, it seems that ARM simply suffers from a bad case of poor organization. I've seen zealous ex-addicts become Christians and go hog-wild on trying to set everyone free..from whatever. They try to get things started, sometimes successfully, but usually not. These are often not the most educated people, but they are passionate about trying to help others. As for the solicitors being asked to give a portion of their tallies to the organization that may be helping them...well, it costs to help people. Could be shady, but I'd give them the benefit of a doubt and encourage them to seek organizational counsel. To be sure, they obviously lack tact and decorum, although that's totally irrelevant in a conversation about addicts and the homeless. But the point is that they seem to be at least trying, and that's more than what most of us do to curb addiction and homelessness in our society. Anyway, to the author...thanks for starting the conversation.




POST A COMMENT

(optional):
:

Permission to Print. Letter to the editor.
 
See our
Elections
page

for more
coverage.

FURTHER READING
Keywords
for this story
Austin Restoration Ministries
Charlie Hodge
Austin Travis County Mental Health and Mental Retardation
Sheila Price
Lee Price
Texas Department of State Health Services
Scott Perry

Deep Focus
Crime and Courts
Health & Human Services
Public Safety

Team Cuisine: Cupid in the Kitchen

BLOGS
Re-Dunking the Tea Bag
Texies and the City
Mobility and You

Sons of Austin
Insane Stoplight Timing
Bicycle Dreams

ARCHIVES
More from
September 25, 2009
News
Arts
Books
Food
Screens
Music
Columns
Sports

Browse the
Archives by
Issue
Author
Column
Review
Section

More by
Jordan Smith
North Austin Showdown: Guns, Property, and Public Nuisances February 5, 2010
Gun rights activists up in arms over shutdown of gun show

State Gives Almaguer Deadline for Tire Cleanup January 29, 2010
Tire shop owner must comply with state law, says TCEQ

Keller Keeps Her Robes, for Now January 29, 2010
Special judge says Keller's conduct in execution case doesn't warrant removal

The Junk Science Conundrum January 22, 2010
Legislators ponder how to keep questionable forensics out of the courtroom

all stories by
Jordan Smith


Short Story Party
Sound Wars
Mind Over Music
Online Contests
Chrontourage
Chronicle Merch

 

Ads of the Day