• newsletters • best of austin • find a paper • submit an event • advertise with us • contact • jobs •
HOME: JANUARY 19, 2007: NEWS
text size

Pushing Skyward on West Seventh

BY KATHERINE GREGOR

Heading toward a vote at council Feb. 1 or 15 is another supertall condominium tower that seeks to push the envelope of what Austin accepts as Downtown. This test-case project – a 32-story, 158-unit luxury condo tower at the southeast corner of West Seventh and Rio Grande (right behind Katz's Deli) – is proposed by Dallas-based CLB Partners, whose other local condo projects include Austin City Lofts and Bridges on the Park. Because Seventh and Rio Grande sits in an historic neighborhood of small homes and low-rise storefronts, just north of the traditional dividing line of West Sixth, the council's decision on this project is being closely watched as an indicator of project approvals or denials to come.

The last such lightning-rod project was Spring Condominiums – a 41-story tower on Third Street (between Lamar and Bowie) now starting construction, which won its needed zoning change at council over vociferous neighborhood objections.

According to a representative for property owner Mike McGinnis, the CLB Seventh and Rio Grande project has a widespread base of supporters; they include the Downtown Austin Alliance and three neighborhood associations: Downtown Austin, Caswell Heights, and Old Austin (aka Tedd Siff). They point out that the site is within the core Downtown area defined by the Downtown Design Guidelines, is surrounded on three sides by Central Business District zoning (although historic designations and Capitol view corridors counteract most of that), and will feature ground-floor retail and Great Streets Program pedestrian amenities.

Despite those arguments – and the deal-brokering savvy of attorney Steve Drenner and consultant Mike Blizzard – the developers lost their request for Central Business District (CBD-CURE) upzoning at the Planning Commission, five to two. Instead, the commissioners recommended rezoning the property Downtown Mixed Use (which would permit a 120-foot condo project similar to the Nokonah). Will council follow their recommendation or overrule it?

Opponents to the 400-foot-tall project – which include the nearby Austin Women's Club, the Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, and the Heritage Society – believe the huge tower is inappropriate right next to the historic-zoned Bremond Block, an area the city has worked to protect. They object to having the project front Seventh Street rather than Sixth Street, which is a designated transit corridor. And they're concerned that CBD-CURE zoning here will set a precedent for another condo tower (by the Spring development team) possibly shaping up for the northeast corner of the same intersection.

Most compellingly, said Katherine Jones of neighboring Milkshake Media, the coalition that opposes immediate granting of high-rise CBD-CURE zoning for the site is asking council not to make this ad-hoc decision until ROMA Design Group completes the new Downtown Plan. Due by year's end, the plan will provide detailed, carefully researched recommendations for revised Central Business District boundaries and this historic northwest quarter of Downtown. Since Austinites will pay close to $1 million for the Downtown Plan, why not wait to see what it says?


MORE NAKED CITY
 
  • NARAL hopes these five legislators are headed for extinction
  • Amended version of Big Box Ordinance bounces back down from council to the Planning Commission, hangs in review limbo
  • In an unusual set of legal circumstances, UT Capital Punishment Center co-director argues to justices that they should refrain from ruling on cases he previously brought to them
  • Coahuila, Mexico, passes measure to legalize same-sex unions; and Babies "R" Us starts new year feeling wrath of both the Minutemen and immigration rights movement
  • Lawsuits are flying to stop dirty power plants
Share Digg Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us LinkedLn Email Print article
COMMENTS
7
 
Not true m1ek Jan 18, 2007 - 09:48 am
"sits in an historic neighborhood of small homes and low-rise storefronts"

Historic homes? Yes.

Historic storefronts? No.

Small homes? No.

The houses remaining in this area are primarily NON-RESIDENTIAL (thus not really "homes" - more like lawyers' offices) and are pretty darn big.

It would take some very charitable parsing of your original sentence to make it anything approaching the truth.



Where's Ranch 616?? guest Jan 18, 2007 - 03:22 pm
Hey, these guys are doing the right thing and building around Ranch 616 and they get no props at all for that?

What happened to the Chronicle caring about the locals? If they were tearing it down you know they'd be up in arms, but maybe Louis Black doesn't eat there.



Not True is not true guest Jan 24, 2007 - 10:49 am
I am a 14 year resident within 300 feet of this proposed tower. Our house is 3 stories tall, one of the tallest in the neighborhood. Our neighbor lives in a one story house (built in 1856) and has been there since 1964. We have poured blood, sweat, tears and plenty of $$ to fix up these homes that were forgotten about in the 80's. We have plenty of neighbors and consider ourselves a neighborhood. Imagine a 32 story condo (think of the Frost building) built 2 doors away from your house adding 2000+ cars a day to your street.


m1ek Jan 24, 2007 - 03:00 pm
What part's not true? 3 stories is huge; most houses in the area ARE big; and most aren't being used as residences, but rather, as lawyers or bail bondsmens' offices.


guest Jan 25, 2007 - 10:20 am
We house 3 families in our 3 story home downtown. The point isn't resident or business use the point is height in a historic area that is listed in most travel books as a landmark destination.


m1ek Jan 25, 2007 - 10:43 am
The story claimed it was going to loom over a neighborhood full of "small houses", stating or implying:

1. the homes were small (3 stories isn't small)

and

2. that most of the area is residential (it's not; most of it is those BIG old homes being used as offices).

That's my argument. You're exaggerating and/or misleading in order to make it look like a condo tower is being placed "in the middle of a residential neighborhood". Huh, where have I heard that one before?



Why the negative slant? guest Feb 14, 2007 - 12:48 am
This condominium could actually decrease traffic, since many of its residents would presumably be downtown business men and women. Also, the building will improve the appearance of the neighborhood, should decrease crime in that neighborhood, should improve business in downtown Austin, and would most probably be a landmark in itself.




POST A COMMENT

(optional):
:

Permission to Print. Letter to the editor.
 
See our
Elections
page

for more
coverage.

RELATED STORIES


Naked City

Dinos in the Dome
NARAL hopes these five legislators are headed for extinction

Follow the Bouncing Big Box
Amended version of Big Box Ordinance bounces back down from council to the Planning Commission, hangs in review limbo

UT Profs Argue Death Penalty Cases Before Supreme Court
In an unusual set of legal circumstances, UT Capital Punishment Center co-director argues to justices that they should refrain from ruling on cases he previously brought to them

Cross-Border Tidbits
Coahuila, Mexico, passes measure to legalize same-sex unions; and Babies "R" Us starts new year feeling wrath of both the Minutemen and immigration rights movement

Coal Goes to Court
Lawsuits are flying to stop dirty power plants

FURTHER READING
More about
downtown development
Will the Shill November 6, 2009
The ex-mayor says this may be your last chance to snap up a condo

What Happened to Affordability? March 23, 2007
Notions of a mixed-income Downtown seem to have faded

We Were the Urban Pioneers March 23, 2007
Our search for the just-right million-dollar condo, in the wilds of Downtown

all downtown development stories
Keywords
for this story
condominium tower
CLB Partners
Mike McGinnis
the CLB Seventh and Rio Grande project has a widespread base of supporters; they include the Downtown Austin Alliance
Downtown Design Guidelines
Bremond Block

Really White Vigilante

BLOGS
White vs. Shami, Round One
Re-Dunking the Tea Bag
Texies and the City

Give Us Your Best Roundhouse Kick to the Head
Mobility and You
Insane Stoplight Timing

ARCHIVES
More from
January 19, 2007
News
Arts
Books
Food
Screens
Music
Columns
Sports

Browse the
Archives by
Issue
Author
Column
Review
Section


Short Story Party
Sound Wars
Mind Over Music
Online Contests
Chrontourage
Chronicle Merch

 

Ads of the Day