• newsletters • best of austin • find a paper • submit an event • advertise with us • contact • jobs •
HOME: SEPTEMBER 8, 2006: NEWS
text size

Soldier of Morality

Spc. Mark Wilkerson learns that it's a lot easier to get in the Army than it is to get out

BY DIANA WELCH



AWOL Army Spc. Mark Wilkerson announced Aug. 31 that he was turning himself in at Fort Hood.
Photo By Eileen Kelley

When Spc. Mark Wilkerson enlisted in the U.S. Army, he thought he knew who he was. "It's like most 18-year-olds," he explains. "You think you know who you are, but it changes." He grew up in Colorado Springs, Colo., part of a conservative, Christian family with a military history: His father and grandfather were military, his grandmother was a Marine, and he was an active member of the Junior ROTC throughout high school. Enlisting seemed like the next logical step. Plus, he was a firm supporter of George W. Bush, for whom he rallied during the 2000 election. And, though he had enlisted before September 11, he says the attack only strengthened his resolve; when he was deployed to Iraq in March 2003, he felt that he "would somehow be avenging the deaths of those people."

When he was actually on the ground, however, his feelings started to change. "When we went, our general mission was to win the hearts and minds of the people," he recalls. "But when I got there, and I saw the people and how we were treating them, I thought, 'We're doing exactly the opposite.'"

At the time, what bothered him most were the raids he and his unit conducted in the homes of Iraqi families. Though Wilkerson is quick to say that his unit was professional, something felt wrong. "I don't want to say that every single raid we did was random, but an alarming number of them were. We would be bored and looking for something to do, so they would order us to go conduct these raids. It bothered me to see that there was no paperwork on these people who we were rounding up and throwing into prison."

It wasn't until he returned to Fort Hood in Killeen in March 2004 that things started to come together for him. Suddenly, he had access to media other than Stars and Stripes, the military magazine that he calls an "army propaganda stunt." When he read how much money "certain individuals were making on this war, how much money the corporations like Halliburton were making" in Iraq, it all clicked into place: He had been lied to by his commander in chief, on more than one count. "He told us they had weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We didn't find any. We were told we were there just to get rid of Saddam Hussein. But we're still there now, even though he's in court. We were told this was part of a global war on terrorism. None of that was true."

When he confided in some noncommissioned officers that he felt he had been deceived, one of them suggested he apply for conscientious objector status. A conscientious objector, according to the military directive, is "a person who objects to participation in all forms of war and whose belief is based on a religious, moral, or ethical belief system." It seemed perfect: Though Wilkerson still considers himself a Christian and can quote a few passages from the Bible that support his cause, he says his aversion to war is not religion-based, but morality-based. "I think that what we are doing there is wrong. There is a very human toll that's happening in Iraq. I know a lot of people look at it this way: The United States has only lost 2,639 soldiers, and they've lost 100,000 Iraqi civilians, so we're winning. That's not how it is at all. Not everyone who dies over there is an insurgent," he says. "That's hard for me."



Spc. Mark Wilkerson with Cindy Sheehan at Camp Casey III
Photo By Eileen Kelley

So, within a month of his return from Iraq, he filed as a CO. It wasn't until November, after eight months of review during which Wilkerson met with a military investigator, a chaplain, and a military psychologist, that he was told he didn't qualify as a CO. And meanwhile, he had learned that his unit was going to be redeployed in January. He had two months. "Right away, I filed a rebuttal," he says, "and was told it wouldn't even be considered until after I returned from my second deployment."

Up until that point, Wilkerson says, he never considered going absent without leave. "It was my last resort because I'm just not going to kill anybody or be killed for reasons I don't believe in, and I was having a really hard time finding anything about Iraq that was honorable."

So, he left. But after 19 months of working odd jobs and crossing his fingers that he wouldn't get pulled over, Wilkerson grew tired of life on the run. A couple of months ago, Cindy Sheehan announced that she intends that Camp Casey III – land she recently purchased in Crawford – serve as a refuge for soldiers seeking CO status. Wilkerson took her up on her offer. There, this past Thursday, onstage with Sheehan, Col. Anne Wright, and anti-war veterans Chas Davis, Geoffrey Millard, and Charlie Anderson, Wilkerson made the announcement that he was turning himself in at Fort Hood. He also came out publicly as a war resister, becoming part of the small, but growing, veteran anti-war community. According to the Web site TomJoad.org, Wilkerson joins 46 other veterans who are public war resisters, many of whom are AWOL and face jail time. Overall, reports on the number of soldiers who are AWOL vary drastically, from 8,000 (USA Today) to 40,000 (Los Angeles Times). "We've had more people in the American military tell the American public that this war is wrong than we have public civil servants, who have no jeopardy when they stand up," said Wright, who in March 2003, after 29 years in the military and 16 years in the U.S. Diplomatic Corps, resigned in opposition to the war in Iraq.

The punishment Wilkerson faces is unknown, as the length of prison time depends on the type of court-martial: A special court-martial maxes out at one year, a general at seven. "There's a small chance that I could be discharged, but it's very small. They say I'll probably get a special court-martial, but I could get a general," Wilkerson says. "I'll serve [whatever] time they give me."

All of those who were onstage, save Sheehan, accompanied Wilkerson on the 40-mile drive to Fort Hood. Upon arrival, Wilkerson became a soldier again: straight-backed, hands clasped behind his back, he ended every sentence with "Sir." He was greeted by Maj. Joe Edstrom, the base's public affairs officer, who explained to Wilkerson what would happen next: He was to be returned to his unit, which had been notified of his arrival. "Once he processes with his unit, it's up to his chain of command what, if anything, would be pending as far as the charges," explained the major.

As Anderson and Davis helped Wilkerson carry his bags onto the base, a supporter yelled, "We support you, Mark!" To a smattering of quiet hand-clapping, Wilkerson turned the corner without looking back.

"Tomorrow is a long day, and tomorrow is going to be a hard day," he had written on his blog the night before, "because this shaved, short-haired guy you see in front of you is not the guy I have been the last year and a half, and they can take my body, and they can do with it what they want, but my spirit is whole and it will be intact, and I will not let the military destroy me again and take away who I am like they did during the first two and a half years in the military. They are not going to win." end story

Share Digg Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us LinkedLn Email Print article
COMMENTS
5
 
wilkerson guest Sep 07, 2006 - 04:57 pm
if the military is not going to win then why did you cross your fingers you wouldn't get pulled over? why are you facing jail time? you really showed the military. have your freedom, and remember the soldier that lost his life from your unit may have been saved if you didn't leave when your friends needed you the most


Soldierof Morality, Spc. Mark Wilkerson learns that it't a lt ... guest Sep 08, 2006 - 11:38 am
It is enlightening to read the situation that a propagandistic government he grew up on has placed Sp Mark Wilkerson in at an early age of life.

Me. A 1964 Army length of service military retiree who served this "ungrateful nd unforgiving" nation in during and over three major engagements in combat and along with 432,000 cohorts would be BETRAYED on retired pay simultaneously with my or their previous retirement is criminal. The law was simply changed by the nation we had given the bast years of our live, and in which has and does discriminn\ate against us to the tune of from 1/4 - 1/3 less than our "ingrate" successor retirees.

We had served under the low draft-era pay and near non-existent allowances. Our successors drew high pay and exhorant allowances and now our, remaining less than 20,000 etirees, base for a COLA is based on that obselete draft-era pay. Oh yes,

Medicare did not even exist when I retired. I knew that I had "earned" life-long health care. No,

in the '70s this same deceitful and unforgiving nation notified us that on attaining age 65 when no longer subject to recall to active duty and wanting health care "Go to Social Security and apply for Medicare part B" along with the draft-dodger or highly paid civilian. So,

for 31 years I have paid; part, most or currently all of my health care along with that of my wife of over 58 years who served with General lGeorge S. Patton's Third Army Field Hospital as a captain nurse in France, Germany and Austria.

Sp Wilkerson is wise to have observed the deceit of this nation at an early age.

All of those so-called leader he has spoken to are self-serving just as my leaders were back in the "40s, '50s and '60s.

Regards,

W.D. Gray

Sumner, IL, 62466



Soldier of Morality, Spc. Mark Wilkerson learns that it's a lot guest Sep 08, 2006 - 11:53 am
Regarding Sp Wilkerson observations of seein wrongs her is just one of many deceits that I and others have had to endure by a "thankless" nation Imagine how grieved victims of our illegal invasion of a soverign nation could seek any compensation for a wrong.

This specific action follows a prir law suit in which the Supreme Court told us, "Congress can do whatever they want to do with the military."

I like the "Patriots." i.e., the yellow bellies or scoundrels.

W.D. Gray

THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

WASHINGTON DC 20301

11 July 1970

AN OPEN LETTER TO RETIRED MILITARY PERSONNEL

As Secretary of Defense I have principal responsibility for advising the President on all matters ranging across the full spectrum of Defense. For this reason, President Nixon has requested that I discuss with you a Defense matter very important to him -- recomputation of retired military pay. I welcome this opportunity to explain my views and recommendations on this important matter.

Like the President, I have long recognized that some form of recomputation is a desirable goal. Since this Administration took office. I have had the Department of Defense continuously studying the problems involved and the steps that might be taken to make meaningful adjustments. I am convinced there is a genuine need to treat the retired members of our Armed Forces More equitably -- we owe this to the men and women who have devoted their lives to a military career.

It is true that there are administrative and legal obstacles in the way. Perhaps more important, the introduction of this change may even become a model for other government retirement systems. whether Federal, State or local. Therefore, we must proceed cautiously to insure that our remedy will be both

effective and lasting. I am confident, however, that the administrative and legal obstacles can and will be overcome.

Unfortunately, there is a much more formidable obstacle in our path that will not be as yielding -- at least -not in the immediate future. Simply stated our problem is the financial constraints the Department of Defense must face. We have submitted a rock bottom budget to the Congress for Fiscal Year 1971 and are presently facing further Congressional reductions. Even more simply stated, the money needed to take this action cannot be made available at this time without crippling other desperately needed Defense programs. For this reason, I am unable to recommend to the President that reco



my thoughts army_princess Oct 01, 2006 - 06:01 am
We all have our own mind on what to do i don't see why when one person choice to take off instade of ging back over seas to the war when they don't beleive in the reason why there over then let them be. My fiance was sent out from fort hood an set over to iraq but he wanted to go b/c he beleive in the reason but not everone does. If We are going to have people die over there. Then there going to reither Mark Wilkerson went over there or not. One person goiving over there would not of saved the many who died over there.I think everyone that is saying well remember the men and women from ur unit that died over there thats crap b/c he can't control who ives and who doesn't over there. Come on now... And to Mark Wilkerson God bless you and thank u for the time u did spend serving our country over there even though u didn't beleive in the reasons.. I Wish i could have the chance to met u.


My old friend guest Nov 07, 2006 - 02:34 pm
Mark is an old friend of mine from Widefield H.S.; I am shocked that this befell him and that he is in the predicament that he is in now, getting nationwide attention for going AWOL. He is a GOOD person with a GOOD heart, and I hope that his convictions lead him down the right path, whatever that may be.




POST A COMMENT

(optional):
:

Permission to Print. Letter to the editor.
 
FURTHER READING
More about
Iraq War
Winter Soldiers Bear Austin Witness February 27, 2009
Iraq veterans to testify about ongoing war

Stop the Loss December 19, 2008
Austin veterans turn away from Iraq and war

August 15, 2008
Are We in Iraq to Stay?; and Time for Percolate-Up Economics

all Iraq War stories
Keywords
for this story
Mark Wilkerson
conscientious objector
Cindy Sheehan

Deep Focus
Transportation

La Pastorela

BLOGS
The Totally Awesome AusChron Newscast is Playing With Fire
Perry Clears Way for Executioner
Doing 25 to Life

Bill Narum: We Call That Art
AE's Coal Conundrum
How Could They?

ARCHIVES
More from
September 8, 2006
News
Arts
Books
Food
Screens
Music
Features
Columns
Sports

Browse the
Archives by
Issue
Author
Column
Review
Section

SPECIAL ISSUES
More Chronicle Anniversaries
20th Anniversary (Sep 7, 2001)

all Special Issues
More by
Diana Welch
Mistrial, Retrial for McKay February 6, 2009
Jurors drop bomb on prosecutors' case against man accused of bomb-making

The Informant January 23, 2009
Revolutionary to rat: The uneasy journey of Brandon Darby

RNC Aftermath January 16, 2009
Austin protester pleads guilty in Minnesota

Activists Raise Concerns About FBI Informant January 9, 2009
Two Austinites, David Guy McKay, 22, and Bradley Neal Crowder, 23, are currently being held in Minnesota without bail for...

all stories by
Diana Welch


Short Story Contest
Online Contests
Chrontourage
Chronicle Merch

 
Arts & Entertainment (108)
Services (108)
Civic (20)
Retail (48)
Food & Drink (67)
Coupons (8)
Jobs (9)

Ads of the Day