• newsletters • best of austin • find a paper • submit an event • advertise with us • contact • jobs •
HOME: SEPTEMBER 19, 2008: ARTS
text size

Arts Reviews

BY BARRY PINEO



Amadeus

Austin Playhouse, through Oct. 19

Running time: 3 hr

So much of theatre is simply about doing the work. In the case of acting, that can be concisely defined as memorizing your lines, opening your mouth, and saying those lines. I can't tell you how many times I've heard an audience member say, "I don't know how you memorized all those lines."

Well, that's it, in an easy little nutshell – that's the work.

On opening night of the Austin Playhouse Equity production of Amadeus, it appeared that some, if not most, of the actors did not do the work. Granted, it was opening night, but these are professionals! If anyone should know their lines, it should be professional actors! It's difficult to say exactly who didn't know the lines, because the person who looks bad almost always isn't the one who is messing up. Suffice it to say that someone – probably more than one someone – didn't know the lines well at all, and the mess it caused happened often enough that it was noticeable and, thus, distracting and irritating. And while I'm sorely tempted to elucidate how this overall lack of knowledge concerning the lines affected the tempo of this nearly three-hour production, I don't want to bore you with it.

Another challenge facing actors is deciding exactly what to do while onstage. An actor can't simply open his mouth and say the lines, can he? Well, actually, most of the time, he can do exactly that. Unfortunately, many actors seem to believe that "doing something" means "I have to do something to make this interesting." So they put on a character. They speak in actor-y voices or they do actor-y things, so everything they do looks fake and, well, actor-y. But so often an actor doesn't really need to do much of anything. Often, the character is wholly contained in the lines the playwright has written, and what the actor needs to do is get out of his own way: just open his mouth and say his well-written lines loudly and clearly, without undue embellishment.

You won't see much trustful, unembellished acting here.

Some of you may read all this and say: "Well, that was a waste! He didn't really review the production!" But I did! So, in case you missed it: What I saw was a theatre chock-full of professional actors, many who didn't know their lines well enough, and some who didn't know their lines well at all, putting on characters I had great difficulty believing in. There were exceptions, most notably Rick Roemer, who is sometimes brilliant in the role of Antonio Salieri, the successful composer who envies the genius of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, and Brian Coughlin, who consistently got out of his own way. But the exceptions didn't really make that much of a difference over three hours' worth of time. Your experience, of course, may be entirely different; after all, now they've got five more weeks to work on it.


MORE ARTS REVIEWS IN THIS ISSUE
 
  • Macbeth
    Austin Shakespeare's staging is strong but at times is lost in its own sound and fury

  • Amadeus
    At the opening of this Austin Playhouse show, some actors hadn't done the work

  • The Politics of War
    This show of political art by Robert Levers and Chris Reno is as timely as it gets

Share Digg Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us LinkedLn Email Print article
COMMENTS
3
 
Recommended but Be Warned:For Every Laugh, Several Looks Over the Precipice AustinLiveTheatre Sep 18, 2008 - 05:44 pm
As a writer on drama rather than as a professional actor, I may be less easily distracted or just less perceptive of stage fumbles. But Barry Pineo does no one much service by concentrating on opening-night jitters. I was there on the second night and saw none of that.

Rick Roemer owns the stage. In his portrayal of composer Antonio Salieri, both as a 73-year-old invalid and as a 40-ish striving court composer, Roemer shows extraordinary attention, precision and energy throughout. He communicates a depth of feeling that is at times hair-raising.

The name “Amadeus” was Mozart's invention, latinizing his given middle name of “Theophilus” – both versions meaning “the love of God.” The play is about Mozart but Schaffer signals as well his principal concern, man’s relationship with God.

At the opening, the aged, ill Salieri addresses us from his wheelchair, evoking us as “persons of the future” to hear his version of his struggle with music, Mozart and God, roughly in that order. Over the accelerated course of a single night we see him transform into his younger self and participate once again in the ten years between the arrival of Mozart at the imperial and Mozart’s death.

David Gallagher as Mozart portrays a very different, difficult evolution. Capering, giggling, and unthinkingly vulgar in the early scenes, Gallagher gives us the accumulating effects of shocks, disasters and deteriorating health on Mozart without losing his fundamental innocence. The child is always there, inside the failing flesh.

The play belongs to these two. Of the supporting actors, the most vivid are Brian Coughlin as the matter-of-fact Emperor Joseph II and the two Venticelli (“little winds”) manservants of Salieri (Huck Huckaby and Christopher Loveless).

It’s not an easy play. For every laugh, you’ll have several looks over the precipice of human emotion. The plot feeds us with the evil delights of Salieri’s successful campaign to diminish Mozart, who was never perceived by contemporaries as a rival to Salieri. We may renounce sin such as Salieri’s and recoil from destruction of the sublime. But as we see retribution arrive, we can feel the pity and fear that Aristotle defined as the essential qualities of tragedy.

For more, see

http://austinlivetheatre.blogspot.com/2008/09/amadeus-austin-playhouse-september-12.html



Unfair Review by Pineo guest Sep 20, 2008 - 12:50 pm
Last night I saw Amadeus and was entranced through the entire production. I agree with AstinLiveTheatre that Pineo saw opening night jitters. By the 19th, it was a smooth production. I saw the Tony winning production on Broadway in 1979 or 80 and the movie several times and this AP production was the most moving of the three. I felt involved with the actors and had no idea it was 3 hours long. Austin Playhouse gets better every season. Bravo to all!


Opening Night Jitters, you say? Wayne Alan Brenner Sep 23, 2008 - 11:39 am
Cool, glad to know that's all they were.

Now: When do the people who paid to see the play on opening night and had to deal with the actors dealing with those putative "jitters" ... when do those people get their money back?

I mean, fair's fair, right? The product's broken, you want a refund.

Or maybe we as audience should always plan to skip Opening Night, if that's how it is? Maybe we should wait, at the very least, until The Night AFTER Opening Night?

Problem is, you serve up a shoddy product at any time, consumers will be repelled. And that repulsion lingers.

Which is why so many people diss theatre in the first place and plan to attend only on The Night After CLOSING Night. Like, "Oh shit, did I miss your show? Well, I really WANTED to come, but, ah, we got caught up in other stuff ..."

Other stuff. Which didn't have, we can assume, Opening Night Jitters.

Your loss, theatre.





POST A COMMENT

(optional):
:

Permission to Print. Letter to the editor.
 
FURTHER READING
Keywords
for this story
Amadeus
Austin Playhouse

Liz Welch and Diana Welch

BLOGS
Doing 25 to Life
BPP Recommends Life
Car2Go Arrives

The Gay Glass Ceiling
Pride and Prejudice
Fire Departments Are Charging for Services

ARCHIVES
More from
September 19, 2008
News
Arts
Books
Food
Screens
Music
Features
Columns

Browse the
Archives by
Issue
Author
Column
Review
Section


Short Story Contest
Online Contests
Chrontourage
Chronicle Merch

 
Arts & Entertainment (108)
Services (108)
Civic (20)
Retail (48)
Food & Drink (67)
Coupons (8)
Jobs (9)

Ads of the Day