• newsletters • best of austin • find a paper • submit an event • advertise with us • contact • jobs •
HOME: OCTOBER 30, 2009: NEWS
text size

Media Watch: 'A Sense of Purpose'

Texas Tribune makes its debut in the realm of nonprofit journalism

BY KEVIN BRASS



Evan Smith is Texas Tribune's CEO and editor-in-chief.
Photo by Jana Birchum

Former KVUE-TV political reporter Elise Hu talks with almost evangelical zeal about her new job with the Texas Tribune, a nonprofit start-up. Set to officially debut Nov. 3, with former Texas Monthly Editor Evan Smith at the helm, the Tribune is more of a mission than a job, Hu says, an opportunity to create a new media entity devoted to in-depth, nonpartisan coverage of Texas government and civic issues. "I think it's an important cause," she said, explaining why she abandoned her job in TV news. "The Tribune has a sense of purpose."

To many industry observers, the Tribune (www.texastribune.org) and nonprofit operations like it represent nothing short of the future of journalism. While traditional media organizations continue to shrink, dozens of nonprofits have sprouted around the country in the last year, hoping that public funds will maintain investigative and public service journalism. Established players like Voice of San Diego and the MinnPost are already affecting their communities, breaking stories, and exposing the gaps in coverage supplied by newspapers and TV.

"I'm not saying there isn't a for-profit model out there" for journalism, said Tribune Chair John Thornton, a general partner of Austin Ventures, a tech-oriented venture capital firm. "It's just not a good business, and it never will be again."

Thornton seeded the Texas Tribune with $1 million of his own money. Another $2.5 million is already committed from a variety of foundations and Texas sugar daddies ranging from former Democratic Lt. Governor Ben Barnes to conservative icons T. Boone Pickens and Red McCombs. The pitch is simple: Public service journalism is a "public good," much like national defense, energy, and environmental issues, and should be removed from the whims of the advertising cycles. "Just as you wouldn't leave [the fates of] clean air and clean water to the free market, you shouldn't leave journalism in the public interest, the watchdog function of journalism, to the free market," said Smith, who left Texas Monthly in August after 17 years with the magazine.

With a staff of 16 at launch, the Tribune will focus on an array of civic issues, including politics, the border, health care, and education. In July, Thornton bought Texas Weekly, the consummate Capitol insider newsletter, and its editor, Ross Ramsey, was named the Tribune's managing editor. The initial reporting staff includes Brian Thevenot, the former special projects editor at The Times-Pica­yune of New Orleans, where he participated in two Pulitzer Prize winners; Brandi Grissom from the El Paso Times; Emily Ramshaw from the Dallas Morning News; Matt Stiles, a database specialist from the Houston Chronicle; and Hu, who will focus on multimedia projects.

"We didn't hire journalists out of work," Thornton said. "We hired reporters who their editors were pissed off that they lost them."

Rather than focusing solely on long-term projects, the reporters will work beats and file stories across platforms, from blogs to podcasts, producing multiple stories a day, Smith says. "We're deliberately not setting up a situation where the reporters go into a windowless room for six months and try to win a Pulitzer," he said.

The Tribune will offer its content free of charge to newspapers and other media outlets. But so far, editors have shown little enthusiasm, reacting with a "mix of puzzlement and outrage," Smith said. Many see the Tribune as competition; others resent the implication that they are not covering civic issues, he said.

The Austin American-States­man is among the newspapers noticeably uncommitted. "We need to evaluate what the Texas Trib­une has to offer before we decide whether to use its material," States­­man Editor Fred Zipp wrote in an e-mail. "It's certainly a competitor for mindshare, but it could become a source nonetheless."

Thornton scoffs at the idea that newspapers are adequately covering the beat. "When's the last time you read a story about lobbying in state politics?" Thornton asked. "I don't think anybody can say with a straight face that people of Texas are as informed on government today as they were 50 years ago."

Within media circles, a minor backlash has formed in recent months against the nonprofits and that type of lofty talk. Some believe the new organizations may do more harm than good, taking resources and attention away from already struggling traditional media companies. "In the current arrangement, we're substituting one flawed business model for another," Slate columnist Jack Shafer recently wrote. "For-profit newspapers lose money accidentally. Nonprofit news operations lose money deliberately."

Some believe the nonprofits are more susceptible to bias than commercial organizations. "No matter how good the nonprofit operation is, it always ends up sustaining itself with handouts, and handouts come with conditions," Shafer wrote.

Smith vigorously denies any bias, noting the Tribune's wide range of supporters. Tell­ing donors they have no control over editorial is no different than telling advertisers to take a hike, he notes. Nevertheless, to help remove any partisan aura to the Tribune, Thorn­ton, a well-known fundraiser for Demo­cratic causes, says he's giving up all political activity, from donations to lawn signs. "The biggest problem in fundraising so far is me," Thornton said. "I want to remove all obstacles."

Beyond politics, critics charge that the nonprofits operate inefficiently and ineffectively, simply creating new bureaucracies, much like public broadcasting. Earlier this year ProPub­lica, a nonprofit devoted to investigative journalism, sparked widespread grumbling when tax records revealed Editor Paul E. Steiger, former managing editor at The Wall Street Journal, is paid $570,000 a year – a whopping sum for mainstream journalism.

Texas Tribune is paying Smith $315,000 a year. Ramsey is making $165,000; technology director Higinio Maycotte, $120,000; and general manager Alisha Ring, $115,000; Thevenot is the top-paid reporter at $90,000. "You don't want clowns who can't get a job working for public media; you want the best you can find," Thornton said. "Did I ask Evan to take a pay cut? No."

To cut the cash burn rate, the staff has agreed to defer 10% of their salaries for the first two years. (Smith and Ramsey are deferring 15%.) Despite the altruistic goals, Thorn­ton promises to run the Tribune as a business. "No doubt, we need to get scale quickly," he said. "But we need to balance that with not spending resources unwisely."

So far, nonprofits have posted a spotty track record. Several smaller entities have already shut down, including the Chi-Town Daily News in Chicago, which couldn't raise $300,000 to keep the lights on. Closer to home, The Texas Observer established its journalism credentials decades ago, yet always struggles to raise money.

Like ProPublica, the Tribune founders believe there is strength in ambition. Plans call for proprietary polling, accessible databases, paid newsletters, and an extensive series of events and conferences, as well as the ubiquitous "multi-platform brand extensions."

Already there are signs the Tribune will be a player on the news beats. Last week Thev­enot broke a story on the Texas Weekly site about a snafu that might result in thousands of Texas teachers not meeting federal standards. And earlier this month Ramshaw covered a controversial proposal to prevent emergency medical technicians from participating in telemedicine video conferences, which could have long-range implications on rural areas.

However, Thornton and Smith know they'll have to produce more than just a few good stories to have an impact. They need to reach beyond the policy wonks, media groupies, and government insiders typically excited by civic-oriented journalism. For all Ramsey's must-read success covering the Capitol, his newsletter only boasted 1,200 subscribers when he sold it. To succeed, the Tribune will have to engage Texans notorious for low voter turnout, lack of interest in the foibles of their leaders, and disdain for intellectual media coverage.

It's hard to measure your impact when the goal is "to help the people of Texas make more informed choices in their civic life," Thornton acknowledges. But, in at least one sense, the Tribune model is no different from for-profits, he says – "We're going to know if we're worthwhile if people keep us in business."

Share Digg Twitter Facebook Del.icio.us LinkedLn Email Print article
COMMENTS
10
 
mjacob Oct 30, 2009 - 12:02 am
First, I love this story. It's really great comedy. 46,599 journalism jobs have been lost since Jan 1, 2008. And this is what John Thornton offers up as his best quote: "We didn't hire journalists out of work," Thornton said. "We hired reporters who their editors were pissed off that they lost them." Mr. Thornton, the journalists who are left in newsrooms may indeed be good reporters and editors, but many of them are still there because they could not demand the bigger salaries of their predecessors who were offered buy-outs and shown the door in order to stop the bleeding. Do you really think you have the cream of the crop just because they were still working? Oh, wait, I hear Bernie Madoff calling -- you should take the call, really, he's got some great options for you.Here's another comedic turn: This is really a non-profit? And, they pay the Editor-in-Chief 315K? That is a bold new take in the non-profit world. So most the money people DONATED will go to BLOATED management salaries in a dismal economy. (Those fabulous reporters aren't making the big bucks, are they?) I did get the request for a $50 donation from Mr. Smith. I was considering it. But, now I would say "no thanks."And, this is a non-partisan, in-depth, news service with a founder who is one of the state's most prolific Democratic fundraisers? I suppose we can rehab drug addicts, even burglars and robbers. Maybe he's gone through some kind of therapy. Still, if you ask me, having Thornton and Smith watching over lobbying at the Statehouse is like having the fox guard the henhouse. They might do that some place else...but the basics are pretty easy to figure here in Texas.Oh, did I say, great story!


"breaking news?" kimmy Oct 30, 2009 - 04:09 pm
I look forward to Thevenot in the market 'cause he's a player... but the story he "broke" was taking a piece of listed agency correspondence and writing a story on it.... a piece of correspondence that Terrence Stutz also found. It was a good story... but it did not require skill.Me? On that day, I was at the high school journalism educators convention, telling the teachers that they were about to get a 10-year revision to the high school j-teks without their input and without a recognition of the changes and trouble our industry faces today. That was... no $90K salary here... on my own dime because that's the way I roll, thank you very much. I think that's what you REALLY call public service journalists....


Jackson Oct 30, 2009 - 04:31 pm
mjacob, You must be one of the many who didn't score a gig with the Trib


Jackson Oct 30, 2009 - 05:18 pm
mjacob, you must be one of the many who didn't score a gig with the Trib. Is that the cause of your animus?Fact is, most dailies in this state, and elsewhere, have been forced to strip newsroom jobs to the bone, and so you have just a handful of decent talent in the newsroom and a whole bunch of lesser lights, not to mention fewer and fewer editors to clean up poorly written copy. During this last legislative session, press briefings held by committee chairs, etc, were attended by one or two or three reporters at most. It was a joke, just like our newspapers are largely a joke (particularly the Statesman), and the people suffer when the politicians can operate without necessary scrutiny.The old model of advertising paying the freight for daily newspapers is dead and done. Just recently, and for the first time ever, the NY Times reported that its circulation revenue now accounts for more cash flow than advertising. That's remarkable.Into this new reality must come a new model. There's no reason to trash those who are attempting to move the ball down the field. As the Bard sang long ago, "Your old road is rapidly fading. Please get out of the new one if you can't lend your hand."


tcarlyle Oct 30, 2009 - 06:53 pm
Still, mjacob and kimmy make good points. You can tell me all day about how lofty the goals are and how solid the news will be: it is still structured on a CEO paradigm that is bankrupting the world. Look at the wage difference between management and staff. The way topics are being discussed, the writing staff sound like "prizes" won in hostile takeovers (a little more modesty, people).Though this all sounds skeptical, I hope for the best for this organization and the news that will be produced. I like the new thinking and the fact that the conceptual model is aligned with the realities of the new media world. But, the old model, namely, wage disparities and a tiered mind-set, is both visible and repugnant.


mjacob Oct 30, 2009 - 10:27 pm
Jackson -- wow you must have scored one of those love-your-$315K-CEO-gigs at the Trib. Good luck! And, thank you for making one of my points again -- your words: "Fact is, most dailies in this state, and elsewhere, have been forced to strip newsroom jobs to the bone, and so you have just a handful of decent talent in the newsroom and a whole bunch of lesser lights." (Mr. Thornton is saying all the "lesser lights" are unemployed or maybe he managed with your help to avoid the "lesser lights.")

I stand in support of any new model for journalism that will work and serve to protect our democracy. But as we continue to reel from the misdeeds of the banking and mortgage industry's crisis, I wonder about this sudden turn to non-profit journalism where donors give to what appears to be a worthy cause and then we again learn where the money is actually going -- not into the journalism or the journalists -- but to management.

I do hope this model can benefit the citizens of Texas and elsewhere as we need strong media. (I'm a big fan of non-profit Voice of San Diego and for-profit Global Post.) Still, from what I have read thus far on this ONE non-profit (Texas Tribune), I am neither impressed nor convinced that Mr. Thornton and Mr. Smith plan to do journalism that serves the best interest of all Texans.



EvaLLorensVelez Oct 30, 2009 - 10:28 pm
I am reporter at the Puerto Rico Daily Sun, a newspaper created by a non-profit cooperative of reporters who lost their jobs when the San Juan Star closed a year ago in the island. We have been operating for a year now and we are doing very well. I disagree with critics who contend that non-profits is a flawed model because that is not our case. I just would like to say that our salaries, however, are nowhere near what Smith and Thornton are making.


Frederick Oct 30, 2009 - 11:43 pm
Here’s what bugs me… in the guise of saving journalism, Evan Smith asks people to give money to the cause. The Knight foundation was convinced to give a quarter of a million dollars. Turns out, that amount doesn’t even cover Mr. Smith’s salary. John Thornton has repeatedly talked about coming up with a business model that emulates National Public Radio – where people give their money in support of good journalism. However, he doesn’t seem to hold public media in high esteem when he gets publicly quoted saying things like, “You don't want clowns who can't get a job working for public media.” Sounds to me like he thinks public media is at the bottom of the barrel rather than being a supreme journalism model worth emulating.People are willing to give money to the cause of saving journalism because they believe it is a worthy goal. It is a worthy goal. There are few goals more important for our society to solve right now. However, when those donors hear that the hard earned dollars that they gave to this cause are really going to pay the exorbitant salaries of executives, they’re going to be ticked off. Ticked off because they might now suspect they were taken to the cleaners…that they were scammed.This is clearly not a non-profit for Evan Smith, who is profiting handsomely. Yet, the plea I’ve heard him make is that people should give money in order to save journalism. In the countless stories written on the Tribune, I have never seen Mr. Smith or Mr. Thornton ask for money so that the executives could drive nice cars and live in big houses in luxurious neighborhoods. I’m thinking that pitch, which would be more honest, would probably not raise as much money. Unless they are willing to really spend the money on journalism, then when asking for your money they should clearly explain how they intend to spend it. They should explain why they deserve your gifts and society’s tax breaks.I’m not willing to give money to the Tribune in order to make Mr. Smith rich. Since this story is out, I can’t imagine too many others will want to give either. Thank you Kevin! However, I would be quite happy to fund journalism projects that actually spend money on reporters, especially those who might have been pushed out by cost-cutting and would like a job looking into tax breaks for the rich and the occasional non-profit.


Frederick Oct 31, 2009 - 12:01 am
Here's what bugs me. In the guise of saving journalism, Evan Smith asks people to give money to the cause. The Knight foundation was convinced to give a quarter of a million dollars. Turns out, that amount doesn't even cover Mr. Smith's salary.John Thornton has repeatedly talked about coming up with a business model that emulates National Public Radio, where people give their money in support of good journalism. However, he doesn't seem to hold public media in high esteem when he gets publicly quoted saying things like, "You don't want clowns who can't get a job working for public media." Sounds to me like he thinks public media is at the bottom of the barrel rather than being a supreme journalism model worth emulating.People are willing to give money to the cause of saving journalism because they believe it is a worthy goal. It is a worthy goal. There are few goals more important for our society to solve right now. However, when those donors hear that the hard earned dollars that they gave to this cause are really going to pay the exorbitant salaries of executives, they're going to be ticked off. Ticked off because they might now suspect they were taken to the cleaners - that they were scammed.This is clearly not a non-profit for Evan Smith, who is profiting handsomely. Yet, the plea I've heard him make is that people should give money in order to save journalism. In the countless stories written on the Tribune, I have never seen Mr. Smith or Mr. Thornton ask for money so that the executives could drive nice cars and live in big houses in luxurious neighborhoods. I'm thinking that pitch, which would be more honest, would probably not raise as much money. Unless they are willing to really spend the money on journalism, then when asking for your money they should clearly explain how they intend to spend it. They should explain why they deserve your gifts and society's tax breaks.I'm not willing to give money to the Tribune in order to make Mr. Smith rich. Since this story is out, I can't imagine too many others will want to give either. Thank you Kevin! However, I would be quite happy to fund journalism projects that actually spend money on reporters, especially those who might have been pushed out by cost-cutting and would like a job looking into tax breaks for the rich and the occasional non-profit.


Public Interest? Or Self serving? PatricioEspinoza Oct 31, 2009 - 03:49 pm
TX Tribune is paying Smith $315k. Ramsey $165k




POST A COMMENT

(optional):
:

Permission to Print. Letter to the editor.
 
See our
Elections
page

for more
coverage.

FURTHER READING
Keywords
for this story
Texas Tribune
Evan Smith
John Thornton
nonprofit journalism

Really White Vigilante

BLOGS
Re-Dunking the Tea Bag
Texies and the City
Mobility and You

Sons of Austin
Insane Stoplight Timing
Bicycle Dreams

ARCHIVES
More from
October 30, 2009
News
Arts
Books
Food
Screens
Music
Columns
Sports

Browse the
Archives by
Issue
Author
Column
Review
Section

Recently In
Media Clips
The 'Statesman's 'World' Keeps on Shrinking March 21, 2008
The Statesman's getting smaller, but for what?

KVET's Panic Attack, and More February 22, 2008
KVET turns into poster child for station chaos, plus other tidbits

Media Watch: Gunga Jenny Meets the November Sweeps December 14, 2007
November sweeps news, rumors, and other stuff


More by
Kevin Brass
Top 9 Media Stories January 1, 2010
1) WETBACK SETBACKS KLBJ-AM morning hosts Todd Jeffries and Don Pryor were suspended after Pryor repeatedly used the term...

Radio Waves December 25, 2009
Station chiefs turn to meters to gauge listening habits

Sammy Allred Back on the Air November 6, 2009
Shake, rattle, and roll in local radio

Animal Stories and Snacking Trends September 25, 2009
If you think TV news is quite dumb enough – you have no idea

all stories by
Kevin Brass


Short Story Party
Sound Wars
Mind Over Music
Online Contests
Chrontourage
Chronicle Merch

 

Ads of the Day